2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.65.205106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure investigation of CoO by means of soft x-ray scattering

Abstract: The electronic structure of CoO is studied by resonant inelastic soft x-ray scattering spectroscopy using photon energies across the Co 2p absorption edges. The different energy-loss structures in the Raman scattering spectra are identified as due to d-d and charge-transfer excitations. For excitation energies close to the L 3 resonance, the spectral features are dominated by quartet-quartet and quartet-doublet transitions of the 3d 7 configuration. At excitation energies corresponding to the satellites in the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
87
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
12
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 0.870 and 2.3 eV peaks are in agreement with x-rays but the 1.84 eV excitation was not resolved with non-resonant xrays and is forbidden in the dipolar approximation, however it has been reported in other optical and x-ray studies such as RIXS and EELS that are sensitive to dipole forbidden cross sections. 38,[43][44][45][46][47] This result highlights the point that the 1.84 ±0.03 eV excitation is dipole forbidden and confirms our claim that we are sampling a quadrupolar matrix element in our neutron scattering experiments.…”
Section: A Comparison With Inelastic X-rays and Optical Techniquessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The 0.870 and 2.3 eV peaks are in agreement with x-rays but the 1.84 eV excitation was not resolved with non-resonant xrays and is forbidden in the dipolar approximation, however it has been reported in other optical and x-ray studies such as RIXS and EELS that are sensitive to dipole forbidden cross sections. 38,[43][44][45][46][47] This result highlights the point that the 1.84 ±0.03 eV excitation is dipole forbidden and confirms our claim that we are sampling a quadrupolar matrix element in our neutron scattering experiments.…”
Section: A Comparison With Inelastic X-rays and Optical Techniquessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The sample shows a completely different behavior after the application EF = -625 kV/cm for 10 min at 260 o C. The shoulder at 779.8 eV has turned into a peak. Two other peaks at 777.3 eV and 782.2 eV, characteristic of CoO [37], start to emerge, making the spectrum almost identical to that of CoO as previously reported [38]. Stronger evidence of a Co 2+ -dominating state is that the peaks at 778.6 eV and 779.8eV are nearly of the same height, consistent with a loss of metallic Co in the film [38,39].…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The ionic bonding in GaN thus causes a low-energy chargetransfer satellite excitation as previously observed in insulating systems such as NiO and CoO. 40,41 This type of satellite can be reproduced using a ligand field treatment within the single impurity Anderson model ͑SIAM͒ including full multiplet configuration interaction to the Ga 4s 2 L −1 state, where L −1 denotes a hole in the N 2p ligand. The energy position of charge-transfer satellites appears about −1 eV lower than the normal emission band with the characteristics of delocalized states with almost constant emission energy as the excitation energy is changed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%