1979
DOI: 10.1039/f29797501522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure of iron(II) and (III) fluorides using X-ray emission and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies

Abstract: Iron(n) and (m) fluorides have been studied using X-ray emission (XE) and photoelectron (XP)spectroscopies. XE data enable the XP peaks to be identified unequivocally ; in the iron(m) compound the F 2p and Fe 3d orbitals were shown to have almost identical energy. The F Ka XE peak profile showed the Fe-F band to be more covalent in ferric than ferrous fluoride. Whilst the F Is binding energy was the same for both compounds a peak shift of 3.0-3.5 eV to higher binding energies was found for all iron orbitals up… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7), several facts happen: (a) a new layer of iron phosphate is formed, confirming the previous results obtained for P (Table 4) However, it is difficult to assign this energy, although it can be related to FeSO 4 (described at 713.6 eV [52]) or FeF 3 (described at 713.9-714.8 eV [53][54][55]). Neither S nor F could be detected in the sample.…”
Section: Surface Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…7), several facts happen: (a) a new layer of iron phosphate is formed, confirming the previous results obtained for P (Table 4) However, it is difficult to assign this energy, although it can be related to FeSO 4 (described at 713.6 eV [52]) or FeF 3 (described at 713.9-714.8 eV [53][54][55]). Neither S nor F could be detected in the sample.…”
Section: Surface Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…More evidences about the intercalation mechanism were acquired by X‐ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS), as shown in Figure . The pristine sample shows an Fe 2p 3/2 peak at 711.4 eV, corresponding to the bonding energy of Fe(II)‐F . This peak shifts to a higher bonding energy of 713.5 eV after charging to 4.5 V, indicating the formation of Fe(III)‐F .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 This difference in BE was attributed to an increase in covalent bond character (decrease in ionic bond character) of the Fe-F bond of FeF 3 compared with that of FeF 2 . 22 The same observation was found during this study.…”
Section: Ionic Bond Strength Differencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…22 This difference in BE was attributed to an increase in covalent bond character (decrease in ionic bond character) of the Fe-F bond of FeF 3 compared with that of FeF 2 . 22 The same observation was found during this study. To determine the degree of ionic bonding found in the various iron compounds, the difference in electronegativity between either high-spin Fe 2C or Fe 3C and the corresponding ligand was determined and then plotted against the Fe 2p 3/2 BE.…”
Section: Ionic Bond Strength Differencesmentioning
confidence: 97%