1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.55.10392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure ofWSe2: A combined photoemission and inverse photoemission study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

11
36
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
11
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of interlayer interaction leads to strong modifications of the electronic and optical properties in all the monolayer systems. They are found to be direct-band-gap semiconductors with the VBM and CBM at the K point of the Brillouin zone, in contrast to the indirect band gaps of the bulk materials with the VBM at the point and the CBM at about 0.55 -K. 15,[25][26][27][28][29][30] An indirect-directband-gap crossover with decreasing sample thickness has been exemplified for MoS 2 experimentally. 12 While the CBM of a WS 2 monolayer has not been studied, a shift of the VBM from the to the K point due to the absence of interlayer interaction has been demonstrated by angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of interlayer interaction leads to strong modifications of the electronic and optical properties in all the monolayer systems. They are found to be direct-band-gap semiconductors with the VBM and CBM at the K point of the Brillouin zone, in contrast to the indirect band gaps of the bulk materials with the VBM at the point and the CBM at about 0.55 -K. 15,[25][26][27][28][29][30] An indirect-directband-gap crossover with decreasing sample thickness has been exemplified for MoS 2 experimentally. 12 While the CBM of a WS 2 monolayer has not been studied, a shift of the VBM from the to the K point due to the absence of interlayer interaction has been demonstrated by angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic band structure of WSe 2 have been calculated by Sharma et al [13] within LDA using the linear muffin-tin orbital (LMTO) method in the atomic sphere approximation (ASA) and also using the full potential linearised augmented plane-wave (FP-LAPW) method. Coehoorn et al [14] have reported the electronic structure of WSe 2 by using augmented spherical wave (ASW) method, while for the same objectives Traving et al [15] have employed the relativistic LMTO and the expanded LAPW methods within the LDA scheme. The FP-LAPW (LDA) calculations to compute electronic band structure of WSe 2 were also performed by Finteis et al [16] and Straub et al [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Till date, no one has attempted the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) approach for WX 2 compounds which is supposed to be more accurate in determination of the electronic properties. On the experimental point of view, mainly photoemission studies have been reported by several workers [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our µ-ARPES spectra show that the valence band maximum is at K for 1ML WSe 2 and shifts to Γ for multilayer WSe 2 . Previous reports [35][36][37] [38][39] using traditional ARPES and inverse photoemission instruments have confirmed that the location of the VBM in bulk WSe 2 to be at Γ ; note that for bulk WSe 2 , ARPES measurements over a large enough photon energy range are required in order to take into account the k z dependence of the observed states. To fully quantify the VBM transition as a function of thickness, we used curvature analysis, [40] or the second-derivative method, to help delineate the electronic band structure, as shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%