Electronic Versus Printed Book: Comparison Study on the Effectivity of Senior High School Physics Book

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of senior high school physics book both interactive electronic and printed, viewed from the difference in gender and material characteristics. The research used Quasi-Experimental Design with Non-Equivalent posttest-pretest control group design. The data were collected through physics tests from six senior high schools in Lampung Province, Indonesia and analyzed on ANOVA and multiple comparisons to determine the differences in learning outcomes (affectivity) and interaction between interactive electronic and printed, gender, and material characteristics. The results showed that there were different learning outcomes caused by interactive electronic and printed physics book (p=0.000<0.05). The learning outcomes using interactive electronic books were better than using printed books for both male and female students while gender differences did not affect physics learning outcomes for both interactive electronic and printed books (p=0.963>0.05). There was no interaction between interactive electronic and printed books and gender (p= 0.298>0.05). There are differences in learning outcomes caused by physical material characteristics (p= 0.000< 0.05). Therefore, it concluded that the high school interactive physics electronic book was effectively used as a learning resource for both male and female students.

Macroeconomic Digital Book Development: How are the Feasibility of Experts and Student Responses?

“…Meanwhile, research from (Rasmawan, 2020;Supriyadi et al, 2020) takes a specific theme again, but the study material is not economic learning, especially macroeconomics. Then several previous studies from several experts showed that the effectiveness of digital books can be compared with ordinary printed books (Uygarer & Uzunboylu, 2017;Suyatna et al, 2018;Abed, 2019). Then in terms of the sample used, the study was limited to using only one class of 36 samples, this is different from previous research from (Shehu & Jere, 2016;Ibrahim & Alqahtani, 2018) which took more samples than the author's research.…”

“…Previous research from several experts (Dewi et al, 2018;Liao et al, 2018;Wusqo et al, 2021) chose non-economic materials in developing a digital book. Then in terms of research variables, several experts examined the effectiveness of using digital books with printed books (Suyatna et al, 2018;Siwiendrayanti et al, 2019;Suryani et al, 2021). Previous research shows that there is no research on the development of digital books on macroeconomic material, previous research is only limited to the development of macroeconomic modules.…”

Mathematical physics e-module: A study of students' perception based on gender

“…(Ayvaz-tuncel & Tuncel, 2019;Chaaban et al, 2021;Osadebe & Osadebe, 2020). In the learning process, gender can be an influential factor (Fitriani et al, 2019;Suyatna et al, 2018). Females have a clearer way of thinking with more organized emotions than males (Xu & Waniganayake, 2018).…”

“…A person's perception can be influenced by gender, which affects differences in roles, functions, positions, responsibilities and behavioral rights of a person which are broadly related to one another (Dharma, 2016). Gender can be a factor that influences the learning process and the achievement of learning outcomes (Liu & Young, 2017;Bhagat & Chang, 2018;Chiu, 2018;Suyatna et al, 2018;Fitriani et al, 2019). Based on gender, it can be seen that there is a positive perception that shows that e-modules can help students understand mathematics and physics material for males and females.…”

Implementation of Web-based Character Assessment on Students' Character Outcomes: A Review on Perception and Gender

“…Gender men and women have different levels of perception. Gender is a factor that also needs to be considered in education (Darmaji, Astalini, Kurniawan & Aldila, 2022;Fitriani, Asy'ari, Zubaidah & Mahanal, 2019;Suyatna, Maulina, Rakhmawati & Khasanah, 2018). For example, Gender women are generally superior and skilled in various activities (Beddoes, 2018;Saleh & Mazlan, 2019;Rizal, Rusdiana, Setiawan & Siahaan, 2020).…”