1995
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-199510000-00026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiologic Effects of Propofol Sedation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1. This is caused by the well-known biphasic EEG response of propofol at concentrations sufficient to induce unconsciousness (35). In our study, the target-controlled effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness was 1.9-tO.6 pg/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. This is caused by the well-known biphasic EEG response of propofol at concentrations sufficient to induce unconsciousness (35). In our study, the target-controlled effect-site concentration at loss of consciousness was 1.9-tO.6 pg/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…This was obtained by the use of a target-controlled infusion (TCI) system. Blood concentrations of propofol were not measured but were calculated using a pharmacokinetic model (13)(14)(15)(16) However, in previous studies (35), using a TCI system with the same pharmacokinetic model (36), discrepancies between calculated and actual blood concentrations were small, even in a long infusion regimen and regardless of weight and gender (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, anaesthetic effects are not uniformly distributed in different brain areas, as it could be demonstrated for propofol by neuroimaging techniques in volunteers or limbic evoked potentials in rats, for example ( 21, 22). In conscious subjects it was shown that sedation induced by low doses of propofol was reflected by an increase in β1 activity (12.75–20 Hz frequency band of the spontaneous electroencephalogram [EEG]) primarily located at frontal and central brain areas ( 23). The generators of MnSSER component N20 are supposed to be located in the primary sensory projection area of the brain, reflecting the afferent somatosensory input from thalamic structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding of high brain complexity (PCI) observed during unresponsiveness induced by ketamine anesthesia is interesting in the context of previous studies employing sensory-evoked potentials and functional connectivity analyses. For example, the late positive P3b evoked by auditory stimuli is equally suppressed during both propofol [41] and ketamine [42,43], even at sub-anesthetic concentrations, and can be absent in awake subjects who do not pay attention to the stimulus [44]. Similarly, front-to-back functional connections were found to be selectively reduced both during propofol-and ketamine-induced unresponsiveness (though coherence is preserved [45,46]) at dosages comparable to the ones employed in the present study and in the presence of a similar background EEG.…”
Section: Complexity Consciousness and Responsivenessmentioning
confidence: 96%