1971
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.34.2.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological estimation of the number of motor units within a human muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
411
1
5

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 621 publications
(431 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
14
411
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the electrophysiology methods have studied the thenar and hypothenar muscles supplied by the median or ulnar nerves, and, to a lesser extent, the extensor digitorum brevis or tibialis anterior muscles supplied by the peroneal nerve, although there are many small studies of other nerve, muscle combinations. More than 7 MUNE methods have been published [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. These can be divided into 3 groups: 1) methods developed >15 years ago where the methodology has been validated but the method is relatively inactive or used in few centers; 2) active methods that are used in multiple centers with validated methodology; 3) active methods that are used in few centers/research centers and the methodology requires further validation.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Number Of Motor Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the electrophysiology methods have studied the thenar and hypothenar muscles supplied by the median or ulnar nerves, and, to a lesser extent, the extensor digitorum brevis or tibialis anterior muscles supplied by the peroneal nerve, although there are many small studies of other nerve, muscle combinations. More than 7 MUNE methods have been published [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. These can be divided into 3 groups: 1) methods developed >15 years ago where the methodology has been validated but the method is relatively inactive or used in few centers; 2) active methods that are used in multiple centers with validated methodology; 3) active methods that are used in few centers/research centers and the methodology requires further validation.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Number Of Motor Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 For diseases affecting the anterior horn cells, especially the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, MUNE is believed to be the most sensitive follow-up tool for the evaluation of disease progression. 7 Since McComas's first proposal, 5 various other MUNE methods have been developed and validated. The adapted multiple point stimulation (AMPS) method has several advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMPS was also proven to be reliable and reproducible, as it minimizes alternation and motor unit (MU) selection bias in estimating thenar MU size and number. 8 The AMPS method combines important elements of the original McComas's technique 5 with the multiple stimulation method, as it can analyze two to three surface-recorded MU action potentials (S-MUAP) obtained in response to incremental stimulation at different points. Eric Albrecht and Thierry Kuntzer 9 confirmed the validity of the method in the lower extremity in healthy subjects and in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or acquired peripheral neuropathies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1971, McComas et al [9] proposed a method for estimating the number of motor units innervating a muscle being studied; such a method would clearly be of great utility in following disease progression in motor neuron diseases or other axonal injuries. However, issues surrounding inter-rater reliability and validity rendered the original method and subsequent alternatives less useful than originally thought.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%