1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(96)00429-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological indices of information processing in methylphenidate responders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this subgroup, poor responders to imipramine demonstrated slower P3 latencies [159]. Sunohara et al [160 ]could not replicate ERP P3 and N2 latencies as baseline predictors for treatment outcome in ADHD children but found some treatment-emergent effects which are in agreement with Winsberg et al [161]. …”
Section: Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Within this subgroup, poor responders to imipramine demonstrated slower P3 latencies [159]. Sunohara et al [160 ]could not replicate ERP P3 and N2 latencies as baseline predictors for treatment outcome in ADHD children but found some treatment-emergent effects which are in agreement with Winsberg et al [161]. …”
Section: Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Smith et al (2004) also reported reduced N1 amplitude in ADHD using a go/no-go task. By contrast, several other studies reported no significant group differences for amplitude in the N1 time range (Rothenberger et al, 2000;Winsberg et al, 1997). It is possible that more consistent effects may be found in the 'processing negativity', which is the negative shift seen in a selective attention task by comparing ERPs of stimuli from the attended to those of the unattended channel, appearing in a time range covering the N1, P1 and N2 (Altenmüller and Gerloff, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the auditory domain the N1 peaks at the vertex (Cz), whereas in the visual domain two main negative peaks can be found: an early anterior N1, and a somewhat later posterior N1 (Vogel and Luck, 2000). The N1 peak amplitude and latency have been studied widely to investigate individual differences in disease susceptibility (e.g., Olbrich et al, 2000;Winsberg et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cochlear implants [Ponton et al, 2000] Psychiatry Schizophrenia [Shelley et al, 1991] Children at risk for schizophrenia [Schreiber et al, 1992] Depression [Ogura et al, 1993] Somatization [James et al, 1989] Alcoholism [Ahveninen et al, in press] Children at risk for alcoholism [Rodriquez Holguin et al, 1998] Neurology Aging [Pekkonen et al, 1993] Alzheimer's disease [Pekkonen et al, 1994] Parkinson's disease HIV [Schröder et al, 1994] Sleep [Atienza et al, 1997] Coma (monitoring and prognosis) [Kane et al, 1993] Frontal-lobe damage [Alho et al, 1994] Thalamic infarctions [Mäkelä et al, 1998] Diabetes mellitus [Vanhanen et al, 1996] Neglect and auditory extinction [Deouell et al, 2000] Other Anesthesia [Csepe et al, 1989] Drug effects Alcohol [Jääskeläinen et al, 1995] Antihistamine [Serra et al, 1996] Cholecystokinin [Schreiber et al, 1995] Flumazenil [Smolnik et al, 1998] Methylphenidate [Winsberg et al, 1997] Naltrexone [Jääskeläinen et al, 1998] NMDA [Javitt et al, 1996] Tacrine [Riekkinen et al, 1997] Triazolam [Nakagome et al, 1998] Vasopressin ] Clozapine [Umbricht et al, 1998] Learning Native language [Cheour et al, 1998a] Foreign language ] Musicality Noise effects [Shtyrov et al, 1999] Hypnosis [Kallio et al, 1999] …”
Section: Audiologymentioning
confidence: 99%