1997
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.24.13262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological studies on rat dorsal root ganglion neurons after peripheral axotomy: Changes in responses to neuropeptides

Abstract: The effect of three peptides, galanin, sulfated cholecystokinin octapeptide, and neurotensin (NT), was studied on acutely extirpated rat dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) in vitro with intracellular recording techniques. Both normal and peripherally axotomized DRGs were analyzed, and recordings were made from C-type (small) and A-type (large) neurons. Galanin and sulfated cholecystokinin octapeptide, with one exception, had no effect on normal C-and A-type neurons but caused an inward current in both types of neurons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In muscle, depolarization of the resting potential underlies inexcitability in hyperkalemic periodic paralysis (28) and contributes to reduced excitability in the rat model of critical illness myopathy (CIM) (29,30). We impaled dorsal root axons to determine the average resting potential and found values in both control and septic rats that were similar to values reported previously for dorsal root neurons (31,32). The average resting potential in axons from septic rats was slightly more depolarized than in axons from untreated rats, but the difference was not statistically significant (-55.7 ± 1.0 mV in untreated vs. -52.6 ± 1.2 mV in septic, P = 0.08).…”
Section: Patients With Rapidly Reversible Neuropathysupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In muscle, depolarization of the resting potential underlies inexcitability in hyperkalemic periodic paralysis (28) and contributes to reduced excitability in the rat model of critical illness myopathy (CIM) (29,30). We impaled dorsal root axons to determine the average resting potential and found values in both control and septic rats that were similar to values reported previously for dorsal root neurons (31,32). The average resting potential in axons from septic rats was slightly more depolarized than in axons from untreated rats, but the difference was not statistically significant (-55.7 ± 1.0 mV in untreated vs. -52.6 ± 1.2 mV in septic, P = 0.08).…”
Section: Patients With Rapidly Reversible Neuropathysupporting
confidence: 53%
“…It is also possible that the greater efficacy of JMV-431 is attributable to the fact that it exerts its effects through selective stimulation of NTS2 receptors, whereas NT acts jointly via NTS1 and NTS2. This interpretation would be coherent with the differential electrophysiological effects of NT on large (expressing NTS2) versus small (expressing both NTS1 and NTS2) DRG neurons (Zhang et al, 1995(Zhang et al, , 1996Xu et al, 1997;Kawarada et al, 2000). It would also conform to the bivalent antinociceptive effects of NT, facilitatory at low doses and inhibitory at high concentrations, observed after local injection of the drug in the rostroventral medulla (Smith et al, 1997; Urban and Gebhart, 1997; Urban et al, 1999;Gui et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Indeed, under voltage-clamp conditions, the effect of NT on small DRG cells is mainly inhibitory via an outward current, whereas on large DRG neurons it is mainly excitatory, evoking an inward current (Zhang et al, 1995(Zhang et al, , 1996Xu et al, 1997;Kawarada et al, 2000). After axotomy, the current elicited by NT on small DRG neurons is shifted from outward to inward (Xu et al, 1997), whereas NTS1, but not NTS2, receptors are downregulated in the same cells (Zhang et al, 1995). Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that NTS1 is responsible for the inhibitory effects of NT on small ganglion cells, whereas NTS2 mediates the excitatory effects of NT on both small and large DRG neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These neuropeptides are also involved in the modulation of DRG neuron activity (X. Zhang et al, 1995;Xu et al, 1997). Importantly, the expression of both these neuropeptides and their receptors are strongly altered after peripheral nerve injury and/or inflammation (Ji et al, 1994(Ji et al, , 1995X.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%