2018
DOI: 10.1111/pala.12346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroreception in early vertebrates: survey, evidence and new information

Abstract: Electroreception is widespread in living vertebrates, and is often considered to be a primitive vertebrate character. However, the early evolution of electroreception remains unclear. A variety of structures in early vertebrate fossils have been put forward as potential electroreceptors, but these need to be reassessed in light of the now substantial literature on electroreceptors in living vertebrates. Here we review the evidence for all putative electroreceptors in early vertebrates, and provide new informat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the true functional role of the pore‐canal system in Tremataspis has remained unclear, with suggestions ranging from mucous canals (Stensiö, 1932) or extensions of the lateral lines (Bölau, 1951; Denison, 1947, 1966) to a system for electroreceptors (Thomson, 1977). King et al (2018) reviewed and discussed these previous suggestions and refuted an electroreceptive role for the pore‐canal system, leaning more toward a mechanoreceptive function similar to lateral lines. This view, however, was not shared by O'Shea et al (2019), who thoroughly investigated the three‐dimensional (3D) histology of a single specimen of Tremataspis mammillata and discussed its potential development and function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the true functional role of the pore‐canal system in Tremataspis has remained unclear, with suggestions ranging from mucous canals (Stensiö, 1932) or extensions of the lateral lines (Bölau, 1951; Denison, 1947, 1966) to a system for electroreceptors (Thomson, 1977). King et al (2018) reviewed and discussed these previous suggestions and refuted an electroreceptive role for the pore‐canal system, leaning more toward a mechanoreceptive function similar to lateral lines. This view, however, was not shared by O'Shea et al (2019), who thoroughly investigated the three‐dimensional (3D) histology of a single specimen of Tremataspis mammillata and discussed its potential development and function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1F). This could suggest that the use of chitin in electrosensory organs evolved in the ancestor to all cartilaginous fishes, perhaps in the placoderms [6]. A more detailed treatment of chitin synthase genes within Chondrichthyes will be reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…S1F and are representative of both elasmobranch and holocephalan lineages. The presence of chitin within the AoL of both subclasses (and in diverse orders within the Elasmobranchii) suggests that this condition evolved in the ancestor to all cartilaginous fishes, perhaps in the placoderms [6]. A more detailed treatment of chitin synthase genes within Chondrichthyes will be reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%