2021
DOI: 10.3390/nano11123336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrospun Polyvinyl Alcohol Loaded with Phytotherapeutic Agents for Wound Healing Applications

Abstract: In this paper, hydroalcoholic solutions of Thymus vulgaris, Salvia officinalis folium, and Hyperici herba were used in combination with poly (vinyl alcohol) with the aim of developing novel poly (vinyl alcohol)-based nanofiber mats loaded with phytotherapeutic agents via the electrospinning technique. The chemical structure and morphology of the polymeric nanofibers were investigated using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The addition of Thymus vulgaris, Sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCurd and PVA do not present the antimicrobial activity (Figure S3 and Table S1 from Supplementary Data), so this effect is due to the loaded CEO. As in other studies [36,66], the different sensitivity of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains to the action of natural antimicrobial agents can be observed. This behaviour can be attributed to the structure of the bacterial cell wall, which contains a more diffusible mucopeptide layer in the case of Gram-positive bacteria, while the in the case of Gram-negative bacteria, the diffusion rate of lipophilic antibacterial compounds was reduced by a lipopolysaccharide layer [52,67].…”
Section: Antimicrobial Testsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PCurd and PVA do not present the antimicrobial activity (Figure S3 and Table S1 from Supplementary Data), so this effect is due to the loaded CEO. As in other studies [36,66], the different sensitivity of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains to the action of natural antimicrobial agents can be observed. This behaviour can be attributed to the structure of the bacterial cell wall, which contains a more diffusible mucopeptide layer in the case of Gram-positive bacteria, while the in the case of Gram-negative bacteria, the diffusion rate of lipophilic antibacterial compounds was reduced by a lipopolysaccharide layer [52,67].…”
Section: Antimicrobial Testsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A gentamicin disk (10 µg) was used as a positive control. All Petri dishes were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The antimicrobial activity was assessed by measuring the diameter of the inhibition zones formed by each sample tested [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antibacterial activity of the PVA/XG hydrogels was evaluated against Gram positive bacteria ( Staphylococcus aureus 25,923 ATCC ) and Gram negative bacteria ( Escherichia coli 25,922 ATCC ) according to a method adapted from a previously reported work [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bacterial strains Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (Gram-positive) and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (Gram-negative) were selected as indicators for determining the antimicrobial potential of co-PEI electrospun membranes and are reference and representative pathogenic microorganisms to which the microbial group belongs …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the samples were cut in the form of 5 mm discs and were put in contact with two reference bacterial strains: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (Gram-positive bacteria) (Thermo Fisher Scientific INC, Dartford, UK) and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (Gram-negative bacteria) (Thermo Fisher Scientific INC, Dartford, UK). The protocol was presented in a previous paper . The diffusimetric method is based on the placement of test samples on the surface of a culture medium validated for such tests (Mueller Hinton Agar, Biorad) seeded with a microbial suspension with a cell density equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard (1.5 × 10 8 cfu/mL).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%