1986
DOI: 10.1139/v86-388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic interactions as a factor in the determination of the HOMO in the liquid state

Abstract: An ellipsoidal cavity model has been used to study the energy changes in occupied molecular orbitals induced by solute–solvent electrostatic interactions. Some benzene derivatives have been selected as solutes. Calculations have been carried out at the CNDO and abinitio STO-4G levels. Important variations in the molecular orbital sequence, involving a change in the HOMO nature, have been observed. A perturbation analysis is employed to understand the orbital evolution from gas phase to solution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such destabilizing orbitals effect can happen, for example, when the FMOs dipole moments do not have the same direction as the molecular dipole moment, thus inducing a destabilizing effect. 89 Conversely, the H(or S)OMO and LUMO orbitals stability are also connected to the total charges of the Ru-complex species. In solution, the H(or S)OMO (and LUMO) energies are −5.02 (−2.44), −6.11 (−2.73), −7.12 (−2.96), −7.05 (−3.03), −7.92 (−3.37) eV for [Ru II (OH)] + , [Ru II (H 2 O)] 2+ , [Ru III (OH)] 2+ , [Ru IV (O)] 2+ and [Ru III (H 2 O)] 3+ , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such destabilizing orbitals effect can happen, for example, when the FMOs dipole moments do not have the same direction as the molecular dipole moment, thus inducing a destabilizing effect. 89 Conversely, the H(or S)OMO and LUMO orbitals stability are also connected to the total charges of the Ru-complex species. In solution, the H(or S)OMO (and LUMO) energies are −5.02 (−2.44), −6.11 (−2.73), −7.12 (−2.96), −7.05 (−3.03), −7.92 (−3.37) eV for [Ru II (OH)] + , [Ru II (H 2 O)] 2+ , [Ru III (OH)] 2+ , [Ru IV (O)] 2+ and [Ru III (H 2 O)] 3+ , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such destabilizing orbitals effect can happen, for example, when the FMOs dipole moments do not have the same direction as the molecular dipole moment, thus inducing a destabilizing effect. 89 Conversely, the H(or S)OMO and LUMO orbitals stability are also connected to the total charges of the Ru-complex species. In solution, the H(or S)OMO (and LUMO) energies are À5.02 (À2.…”
Section: Frontier Molecular Orbitalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HOMO orbital energy is unaffected and the HOMO-1 orbital is only very slightly stabilized. This variability in orbital energy stabilization is not uncommon [34][35][36] and only recently has a systematic understanding of the effects been considered. 37 The red shift in the S 0 -S 1 transition can be rationalized as a result of the LUMO orbital energy being stabilized preferentially by the more polar solvent field.…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it is also well known that computed in solution phase is different from that in gas phase due to the interaction between solute and solvent. [4][5][6][7] The electronic structure of solvated molecule can be calculated using solvation theory such as the family of reference interaction site modelself-consistent field [8][9][10] ͑RISM-SCF͒ and polarizable continuum model ͑PCM͒. 11 However, the obtained shifts look often random; sometimes increases and sometimes decreases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%