2005
DOI: 10.1021/es0503027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic Precipitator Performance and Trace Element Emissions from Two Kraft Recovery Boilers

Abstract: Fine particle emissions from combustion sources have gained attention recently due to their adverse effects on human health. The emission depends on the combustion process, fuel, and particulate removal technology. Particle concentrations at Kraft recovery boiler exits are very high, and the boilers are typically equipped with electrostatic precipitators (ESP). However, little data are available on the ESP performance in recovery boilers. Particle concentrations and size distributions were determined at two mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The typical concentration range of collected fine (0.2e1 mm) dust is 5e15 g m À3 of flue gas (Hupa, 1993), and the separation efficiency is often over 99% (Lind et al, 2006). Electrostatically separated fly ash is typically mixed with black liquor and re-burned in a recovery boiler.…”
Section: Electrostatic Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical concentration range of collected fine (0.2e1 mm) dust is 5e15 g m À3 of flue gas (Hupa, 1993), and the separation efficiency is often over 99% (Lind et al, 2006). Electrostatically separated fly ash is typically mixed with black liquor and re-burned in a recovery boiler.…”
Section: Electrostatic Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emissions from Kraft recovery boilers have been shown to consist largely of sodium and sulfate particles (i.e., Na 2 SO 4 ) with lesser but significant amounts of chlorine and potassium. 19,20 Vanadium and nickel, which are associated with oil combustion, 15 are …”
Section: Pmf Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, an average fractional-penetration profile for baghouse filters based on all three studies was calculated. A set of size-dependent correction factors for another control device, the electrostatic precipitator (ESP), was also determined from penetration fraction data published in Lind et al (2006). These two sets of size-bin-specific correction factors were then applied as follows to the final calculated size-bin weight factors for the uncontrolled profiles to obtain the final corrected weight factor set.…”
Section: Analysis Of Individual Pm Size Distribution Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that not all facilities belonging to these five source types necessarily use baghouse filters as their control device, but this particular control device was assumed for all such facilities due to the availability of size-resolved control efficiency measurements. In the studies by Lind et al (2006) and Mikkanen (2000), however, an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) was specified as the control device for PM emissions from a kraft recovery furnace. The authors of the Lind et al (2006) study only included the size distribution plot for the sample obtained before the ESP, but they also published penetration fraction data for the ESP by measuring samples before and after treatment.…”
Section: Analysis Of Individual Pm Size Distribution Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%