2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab94a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Element Stratification in the Middle-aged SN Ia Remnant G344.7–0.1

Abstract: Despite their importance, a detailed understanding of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) remains elusive. X-ray measurements of the element distributions in supernova remnants (SNRs) offer important clues for understanding the explosion and nucleosynthesis mechanisms for SNe Ia. However, it is challenging to observe the entire ejecta mass in X-rays for young SNRs, because the central ejecta may not have been heated by the reverse shock yet. Here we present over 200 kilosecond Chandra observations of the Type Ia SNR G… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies, including Y14, extracted the spectrum from the entire remnant, but the centroid energies extracted from different regions may not agree with the centroid from the entire remnant. Our spatially resolved fits in 3C 397 reveal statistically significant variations in the Fe Kα centroid energy up to 100 eV, spanning both the Type Ia and CC regions designated by Y14; for G344.7-0.1 the variations reached 130 eV (Fukushima et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior studies, including Y14, extracted the spectrum from the entire remnant, but the centroid energies extracted from different regions may not agree with the centroid from the entire remnant. Our spatially resolved fits in 3C 397 reveal statistically significant variations in the Fe Kα centroid energy up to 100 eV, spanning both the Type Ia and CC regions designated by Y14; for G344.7-0.1 the variations reached 130 eV (Fukushima et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We find statistically significant variation in the Fe Kα centroid across various regions; the energy of the centroid varies by about 100 eV over the remnant surface. While this variation is large, we note that Fukushima et al (2020) report a variation of ∼ 130 eV for various Fe Kα centroid energies in Figure 3. A comparison of the Fe Kα centroid energies for each remnant, with the results of Y14 shown as magenta lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Interestingly, no dense Hi clouds are adjacent to the southeast shells, where the shock velocity shows the maximum value in SN 1006 (Winkler et al 2014). We also note that the Hi intensity of SN 1006 is about 3-10 times weaker than that of the typical Type Ia SNRs interacting with Hi clouds in the Galactic plane (e.g., Sano et al 2017;Fukushima et al 2020).…”
Section: Overview Of X-ray and Hi Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The presence of dense-gas wall and the SD scenario were also supported by the rapid shock deceleration during the last ∼15 yr (Tanaka et al 2021). Subsequent CO and Hi studies found similar expanding shells of atomic and/or molecular clouds in the Type Ia SNRs RCW 86 (Sano et al 2017), N103B (Sano et al 2018;Alsaberi et al 2019), and G344.7−0.1 (Fukushima et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The ionization parameter of the Fe ejecta is found to be significantly lower than that of the IME ejecta in any regions (Table 1). This is a common characteristic of SNRs Ia (e.g., Badenes et al 2007;Sawada et al 2019;Fukushima et al 2020) and indicates the stratified elemental composition with Fe at the interior so that the Fe ejecta are heated by the reverse shock more recently than the IME ejecta. Such elemental stratification is indeed observed in the radial profile shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Spectral Modelingmentioning
confidence: 85%