“…Offline methods, such as previous filter-based measurements, possess the potential to fractionate particulate elements into different bioavailable forms , and typically offer higher sensitivity, allowing for the detection of a broader range of elements compared to online techniques. However, it is important to acknowledge that offline methods, like the collection and analysis of 24-h integrated filters, come with labor-intensive processes, limited sample sizes that may not capture rapid pollution changes effectively, , and potential issues related to sampling artifacts and background residues . Additionally, a crucial step in offline analysis involves acid digestion with a microwave digestion device, which, while effective, is not a nondestructive method and may yield variable element recoveries ranging from 60% to 130%. , Furthermore, previous research has predominantly been conducted in urban settings, potentially providing an incomplete picture of PM 2.5 -bound elements in various environments.…”