1950
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1950.036159950014000c0029x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elemental Sulfur and Its Relationship to Manganese Availability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1953
1953
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S-application significantly increased available Mn (DTPA extractable Mn) in calcareous soils at all rates of S-application (Table 3). Highest values of available Mn were recorded in the surface soil (0-10cm) and after 3-6 weeks of incubation and were not associated with the lowest pH values suggesting that the increase in Mn may be attributed to the reducing effect of sulphur rather than to the decrease in pH (Garey and Barber, 1952;Tisdale and Bertramson, 1949). Table 4 shows that S-application increased available Mn in the surface (0--10cm) of the three soils in the order: Dirab loamy sand ,~ Kharge sandy < Qasseem sandy loam.…”
Section: Effect Of S-application On Chemically Available Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S-application significantly increased available Mn (DTPA extractable Mn) in calcareous soils at all rates of S-application (Table 3). Highest values of available Mn were recorded in the surface soil (0-10cm) and after 3-6 weeks of incubation and were not associated with the lowest pH values suggesting that the increase in Mn may be attributed to the reducing effect of sulphur rather than to the decrease in pH (Garey and Barber, 1952;Tisdale and Bertramson, 1949). Table 4 shows that S-application increased available Mn in the surface (0--10cm) of the three soils in the order: Dirab loamy sand ,~ Kharge sandy < Qasseem sandy loam.…”
Section: Effect Of S-application On Chemically Available Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Mn(IV) and Fe(III) nonenzymatically oxidize sulfide (Table 1, reactions 1 and 2) but only to the redox level of S0 (5,16). Thus, it has been suspected that the production of sulfate in Mn(IV)-amended marine sediments (1, 21), as well as the production of Mn(II) and sulfate in soils amended with S0 (38,40), is the result of microorganisms catalyzing the oxidation of So to sulfate with Mn(IV) serving as the electron acceptor (Table 1, reaction 3). The finding that metabolic inhibitors inhibit Mn(IV)-dependent sulfate production in marine sediments (1) further supports this possibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that soil acidification by elemental S results in increased uptake of Mn by plants (Garey and Barber, 1952;Hassan and Olson, 1966;Procopiou et al, 1976). It has been suggested that a major effect of S on Mn availability is in a decrease of the easily reducible Mn in soil as S is oxidized rather than soil acidification directly (Tisdale and Bertramson, 1959). Organic complexing of Cu and Fe in soils appears to result in their solubility being less pH dependent than that of Mn and Al (Haynes and Swift, 1985).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%