1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00199.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated atmospheric CO2 increases fine root production, respiration, rhizosphere respiration and soil CO2 efflux in Scots pine seedlings

Abstract: In this study, we investigated the impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 (ambient + 350 μmol mol–1) on fine root production and respiration in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings. After six months exposure to elevated CO2, root production measured by root in‐growth bags, showed significant increases in mean total root length and biomass, which were more than 100% greater compared to the ambient treatment. This increased root length may have lead to a more intensive soil exploration. Chemical analysis of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
64
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
7
64
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although similar results have been observed in other ecosystems (George et al 2003, Tjoelker et al 1999, contrary results have also been reported (Janssens et al 1998, Edwards & Norby 1999, BassiriRad et al 1996, making broad statements on how elevated CO 2 affects root respiration difficult to infer. However, nitrogen contents of A. dumosa and L. tridentata roots sampled from the elevated CO 2 plots at the NDFF are not significantly different from those from ambient CO 2 plots (Nowak et al unpublished data), and L. tridentata root nitrogen was also not affected in our greenhouse experiment after 10 months of CO 2 treatment (Table 4).…”
Section: The Nevada Desert Face Facilitysupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Although similar results have been observed in other ecosystems (George et al 2003, Tjoelker et al 1999, contrary results have also been reported (Janssens et al 1998, Edwards & Norby 1999, BassiriRad et al 1996, making broad statements on how elevated CO 2 affects root respiration difficult to infer. However, nitrogen contents of A. dumosa and L. tridentata roots sampled from the elevated CO 2 plots at the NDFF are not significantly different from those from ambient CO 2 plots (Nowak et al unpublished data), and L. tridentata root nitrogen was also not affected in our greenhouse experiment after 10 months of CO 2 treatment (Table 4).…”
Section: The Nevada Desert Face Facilitysupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In numerous experiments, CO 2 enrichment elicited an increase in the degree of ectomycorrhizal colonization as well as changes in the morphotype assemblages (Godbold & Berntson, 1997;Treseder, 2004;Alberton et al, 2005). Increased root length and thickening of diameter (Janssens et al, 1998, Pritchard et al, 2001) along with enhanced storage of starch in fine roots (Janssens et al, 1998) has been observed under CO 2 enrichment. Whether the reduced SRL in secondary roots is related to an increased accumulation of structural carbohydrates at elevated CO 2 still needs to be demonstrated experimentally.…”
Section: Specific Root Length As a Stress Indicatormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Vegetation exposed to atmospheric CO 2 enrichment responds by substantially increasing belowground C allocation, directed to the root biomass, particularly to the fine roots (King et al, 1996;Crookshanks et al, 1998, Janssens et al, 1998, Matamala & Schlesinger, 2000Jastrow et al, 2005). The within-root biomass allocation, however, varies from species to species.…”
Section: Specific Root Length As a Stress Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have shown that the spatial-temporal variation in soil CO 2 effluxes is significant at different scales and is sensitive to environmental factors, such as soil temperature [6,7], soil water [8,9], soil texture [10,11], and root density [12]. Limited information about differentiation and diversities at various scales brings about measurement uncertainties of CO 2 efflux from soil [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%