2014
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.16.6673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated PIVKA-II is Associated with Early Recurrence and Poor Prognosis in BCLC 0-A Hepatocellular Carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, only one study has reported the role the cutoff value of PIVKA-II determined using ROC curve analysis in predicting ER after hepatectomy. 20 In this study, we found that an area under the ROC curve of 0.804 (cutoff value = 46 mAU/mL) for PIVKA-II showed a good predictive performance regarding ER after hepatectomy. However, it remains to be confirmed whether the predictive value of the PIVKA-II level can be generalized to patients undergoing hepatectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, only one study has reported the role the cutoff value of PIVKA-II determined using ROC curve analysis in predicting ER after hepatectomy. 20 In this study, we found that an area under the ROC curve of 0.804 (cutoff value = 46 mAU/mL) for PIVKA-II showed a good predictive performance regarding ER after hepatectomy. However, it remains to be confirmed whether the predictive value of the PIVKA-II level can be generalized to patients undergoing hepatectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…18,19 In addition, there is now a large body of evidence indicating that PIVKA-II has a p prognostic and predictive value for recurrence after hepatic resection. [20][21][22][23] Most studies use a predefined value of PIVKA-II based on existing knowledge to evaluate risk factors for ER after hepatectomy. To our knowledge, only one study has reported the role the cutoff value of PIVKA-II determined using ROC curve analysis in predicting ER after hepatectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusions about the relation between AFP, PIVKA-II and clinicopathologic features (such as vascular invasion, tumor differentiation and size) were different, even controversial [9][10][11][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were few studies on the correlation between the above two indicators and vascular invasion, tumor differentiation and size. And the conclusions are controversial [9][10][11]. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of PIVKA-II and AFP in the diagnosis of HCC and futher analysis the level of AFP and PIVKA-II in HCC patients with different clinicopathologic characteristics such as tumor differentiation and vascular invasion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were few studies on the correlation between the above two indicators and vascular invasion, tumor differentiation and size. And the conclusions are controversial [9][10][11]. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of PIVKA-II and AFP in the diagnosis of HCC and futher analysis the level of AFP and PIVKA-II in HCC patients with different clinicopathologic characteristics such as tumor differentiation and vascular invasion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%