2018
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated CO2 did not affect the hydrological balance of a mature native Eucalyptus woodland

Abstract: Elevated atmospheric CO concentration (eC ) might reduce forest water-use, due to decreased transpiration, following partial stomatal closure, thus enhancing water-use efficiency and productivity at low water availability. If evapotranspiration (E ) is reduced, it may subsequently increase soil water storage (ΔS) or surface runoff (R) and drainage (D ), although these could be offset or even reversed by changes in vegetation structure, mainly increased leaf area index (L). To understand the effect of eC in a w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
63
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(177 reference statements)
7
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, assuming that wood construction costs remain stable between treatments, similar stem growth rates should result in similar growth respiration. Likewise, assuming similar sapwood volume (Gimeno et al, ) and bark thickness (measured at the time of NDIR probe insertion) between treatments, an equal amount of stem living cells might also result in equal maintenance respiration under ambient and eCO 2 , as similarly observed at the leaf level (Crous et al in preparation). On the other hand, a modest increase in R S under eCO 2 could be expected at EucFACE due to (a) enhanced C translocation belowground (Drake et al, ; Hasegawa et al, ) and therefore stimulated phloem function or due to (b) increased soil nutrient availability (Hasegawa et al, ; Ochoa‐Hueso et al, ) from which stem living tissues could intensify their respiratory activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, assuming that wood construction costs remain stable between treatments, similar stem growth rates should result in similar growth respiration. Likewise, assuming similar sapwood volume (Gimeno et al, ) and bark thickness (measured at the time of NDIR probe insertion) between treatments, an equal amount of stem living cells might also result in equal maintenance respiration under ambient and eCO 2 , as similarly observed at the leaf level (Crous et al in preparation). On the other hand, a modest increase in R S under eCO 2 could be expected at EucFACE due to (a) enhanced C translocation belowground (Drake et al, ; Hasegawa et al, ) and therefore stimulated phloem function or due to (b) increased soil nutrient availability (Hasegawa et al, ; Ochoa‐Hueso et al, ) from which stem living tissues could intensify their respiratory activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Vertical CO 2 flux through the xylem (F T, μmol CO 2 m −3 s −1 ), the storage flux (ΔS , μmol CO 2 m −3 s −1 ), and total stem respiration (R S , μmol CO 2 m −3 s −1 ) was estimated following the mass balance approach proposed by McGuire and Teskey (): FT=FnormalH20×normalΔ[]CO2*/normalV, ΔS=()CO2*TiCO2*Ti1×SWC/normalt, RS=FT+EnormalA_normalV+ΔS, where F H20 is tree sap flow (L s −1 ), Δ[CO 2 * ] (μmol CO 2 L −1 ) is the difference of sap [CO 2 * ] measured above and below the stem collar, V is the sapwood volume (m 3 ) of the stem segment delimited by the NDIR probes (m 3 ), ΔS is the storage flux that accounts for the build‐up of CO 2 within the monitored stem segment, [CO 2 * ] Ti and [CO 2 * ] Ti‐1 is the mean of sap [CO 2 * ] above and below the collar at i and i − 1 moment, respectively, SWC is the stem water content (L m −3 , obtained from woody samples of trees located outside the rings, Gimeno et al, ), t is the elapsed time between consecutive measurements (s), and E A_V is stem CO 2 efflux on a volume basis (μmol CO 2 m −3 s −1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Annual mean precipitation is about 800 mm (1881–2018, BOM; station: 067021). The site was relatively moist in 2012–2013 and between mid‐2014 and mid‐2017 (Gimeno et al, ; Gimeno, McVicar, O'Grady, Tissue, & Ellsworth, ; Pathare et al, ). The soil is a nutrient‐poor loamy sand (Aeric yellow podosol) and phosphorus‐limited, with foliar nutrition described in Crous, Ósvaldsson, and Ellsworth ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%