Elevated temperatures translate into reduced dispersal abilities in a natural population of an aquatic insect

Abstract

Rising global temperatures force many species to shift their distribution ranges. However, whether or not (and how fast) such range shifts occur depends on species' dispersal capacities. In most ecological studies, dispersal‐related traits (such as the wing size or wing loading in insects) are treated as fixed, species‐specific characteristics, ignoring the important role of phenotypic plasticity during insect development. We tested the hypothesis that dispersal‐related traits themselves vary in dependence of ambient environmental conditions (temperature regimes, discharge patterns and biotic interactions during individual development). We collected data over 8 years from a natural population of the crane fly Tipula maxima in central Germany. Using linear mixed‐effect models, we analysed how phenotypic traits, phenological characteristics and population densities are affected by environmental conditions during the preceding 3, 6 and 12 months. We found a moderate (5.6%) increase in wing length per 1°C increase in mean annual temperatures during the previous year. At the same time, body weight increased by as much as 17.8% in females and 26.9% in males per 1°C, likely driven by increased habitat productivity, which resulted in a 16.4% (female) and 19.3% (male) increased wing loading. We further found a shorter, more synchronized emergence period (i.e. a narrower time frame for dispersal) with increasing temperatures. Altogether, our results suggest that dispersal abilities of T. maxima were negatively affected by elevated temperatures, and we discuss how similar patterns might affect the persistence of populations of other aquatic insects, especially stenoecious taxa with narrow distribution ranges. Our study calls for integration of information on temperature‐induced phenotypic plasticity of dispersal‐related traits into models forecasting range shifts in the face of climate change. Furthermore, the patterns reported here are likely to affect metapopulation dynamics of aquatic insects under climate change conditions and may contribute to the ongoing decline of insect biomass and diversity.

Further evidence for a global decline of the entomofauna

“…Apart from the lack of distinction between the two metrics in that study, a close inspection of the dataset reveals that other arthropods and invertebrates are included, many of which are invasive species and follow opposite trends to those of insects alone (Jourdan et al . 2019). Considering only aquatic insects, many population increases are due to recovery of communities in regions where water quality has improved (e.g.…”

“…UK, Germany, Sweden and France), although a trend towards thermophilic and invasive species is also evident (Jourdan et al . 2019). For example, in the middle Loire River (France), a reduction of eutrophication from the mid‐1990s onwards has allowed a recovery of pollution‐sensitive caddisflies (e.g.…”

A Review of the Phenotypic Traits Associated with Insect Dispersal Polymorphism, and Experimental Designs for Sorting out Resident and Disperser Phenotypes

“…Effects on dispersal distances [88], effects on emigration rate (but also depends on the availability of trophic resources) [89], effects on successful immigration [80] Level of relatedness, consanguinity Kin competition, inbreeding avoidance Increased dispersal distance [4,87] Manipulation of the biotic environment Temperature of the dispersal assay Aerobic metabolism (energy production) Depending on the temperature, increased or decreased dispersal speed [99] Manipulation of the dispersal system…”

Beyond the Headlines: The Influence of Insurance Pest Management on an Unseen, Silent Entomological Majority

“…While water-soluble insecticides are arguably the best place to start in assessing mortality factors for aquatic insects, we note also that there are important additional and overlapping stressors upon aquatic insect populations that may confound attempts to track the effect of neonicotinoids on aquatic systems (Beketov and Liess, 2008). As neonicotinoid adoption has increased, so have levels of other stressors associated with agricultural intensification, including habitat loss and climate change (Verberk et al, 2016;Cavallaro et al, 2018;Jourdan et al, 2019;Baranov et al, 2020). There are other challenges in tracking the effects of neonicotinoids in aquatic systems, largely due to aquatic insects' often-cryptic nature (many live under rocks, leaf debris, or within sediment) and a dearth of basic naturalhistory information or population data.…”