2017
DOI: 10.1145/3161587.3161595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eliminating Channel Feedback in Next-Generation Cellular Networks

Abstract: This paper focuses on a simple, yet fundamental question: "Can a node infer the wireless channels on one frequency band by observing the channels on a different frequency band?" This question arises in cellular networks, where the uplink and the downlink operate on different frequencies. Addressing this question is critical for the deployment of key 5G solutions such as massive MIMO, multiuser MIMO, and distributed MIMO, which require channel state information. We introduce R2-F2, a system that enables LTE bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the center frequency of Band 1 (IMT) is 2100 MHz, while the duplex spacing is 190 MHz; the center frequency of Band 30 (WCS) used by AT&T in the United States is 2300 MHz, while the frequency spacing is only 45 MHz [212]. Field measurements disseminated in the literature have shown that the uplink and downlink transmissions travel along the same propagation paths and experience similar multipath clusters [213], [214]. If the channel parameters, such as the complex path gain, path delay and the angle of each individual path is accurately estimated from the pilot signals in one frequency band, the channel state in another frequency band can be calculated from these parameters based on the FDD channel model provided in [211].…”
Section: ) Fdd Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the center frequency of Band 1 (IMT) is 2100 MHz, while the duplex spacing is 190 MHz; the center frequency of Band 30 (WCS) used by AT&T in the United States is 2300 MHz, while the frequency spacing is only 45 MHz [212]. Field measurements disseminated in the literature have shown that the uplink and downlink transmissions travel along the same propagation paths and experience similar multipath clusters [213], [214]. If the channel parameters, such as the complex path gain, path delay and the angle of each individual path is accurately estimated from the pilot signals in one frequency band, the channel state in another frequency band can be calculated from these parameters based on the FDD channel model provided in [211].…”
Section: ) Fdd Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beamformer can work with IMU sensors whose function is to feed the system with position of the airborne platform. Several techniques are available to decode the instantaneous channel coefficients, such as pilot signal, channel sounding, semi-blind estimation [ 149 ], blind estimates [ 150 ], and feedback channels [ 151 , 152 ].…”
Section: Multiple Input Multiple Output Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDD mode is dominant in existing cellular connections, e.g., LTE, NB-IoT, and it is also an indispensable mode in 5G and beyond [ 27 ]. In FDD mode, the uplink and downlink transmissions operate at different carrier frequencies simultaneously.…”
Section: Crkg In Three Typical Duplex Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duplex spacing is generally less than of the center frequency. Literature and field measurements have shown that the uplink and downlink transmissions travel the same propagation paths and experience the same clusters [ 27 , 35 ]. The frequency spacing leads to the path differences between the uplink and downlink, especially to the phases.…”
Section: Crkg In Three Typical Duplex Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%