2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elimination of pharmaceuticals in sewage treatment plants in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
213
2
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 539 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
20
213
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been suggested that some metabolites, in particular glucuronide conjugates, can be transformed back into the parent PPCP during secondary treatment. 43,62,63 These examples highlight the need for future studies to include metabolites when assessing the fate of PPCPs during secondary treatment.…”
Section: Ppcp Occurrence and Removal During Wastewater Treatment:mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has also been suggested that some metabolites, in particular glucuronide conjugates, can be transformed back into the parent PPCP during secondary treatment. 43,62,63 These examples highlight the need for future studies to include metabolites when assessing the fate of PPCPs during secondary treatment.…”
Section: Ppcp Occurrence and Removal During Wastewater Treatment:mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,70,75,76,134 Unfortunately, to date no single approach has emerged that accurately predicts PPCP removal during wastewater treatment over a wide range of treatment technologies, water quality conditions, and PPCP compounds and compound classes.…”
Section: B Predicting Ppcp Removal Efficiency and Occurrence In Treamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median removal efficiency of BF was found to be 87% in six Italian WWTPs (Castiglioni et al, 2006), similar to that observed (83%) in this study. It is notable that CBZ showed a negative removal efficiency (i.e., − 67%), which possibly arose from the transformation of the conjugated forms (e.g., glucuronide conjugate, hydroxylated metabolites) into the free form by microorganisms (Miao et al, 2005;Vieno et al, 2007). Table 4 presents the concentrations of target pharmaceuticals in various sludge samples (i.e., anaerobic, anoxic, oxic, and return) along the A/A/O treatment process.…”
Section: Residual Pharmaceuticals Detection In a Municipal Wwtpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because conventional wastewater treatment processes are not specifically designed for the effective removal of pharmaceuticals, the secondary effluent and the sludge of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been proven to be an important pollution source of pharmaceuticals (Nakada et al, 2006;Vieno et al, 2007). Nowadays, serious concerns have been raised regarding the occurrence of pharmaceuticals in the environment due to an increasing reuse of wastewater effluent and excess sludge (e.g., landscape irrigation, crop irrigation, biofertilizer) (Sabourin et al, 2012;Wu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a pharmaceutical is occurring mainly in the dissolved phase, biodegradation is suggested to be the most important elimination process in wastewater treatment. It can occur either in aerobic (and anaerobic) zones in activated sludge treatment, or anaerobically in sewage sludge digestion (Vieno et al, 2007). In addition, biological decomposition of micro-pollutants, including PhACs, increases with an increase in hydraulic retention time.…”
Section: Current Status Of Residue Phacs In the Aquatic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%