Elterliches Erziehungsverhalten und Sozialverhalten im Grundschulalter

Franiek, Sabine; Reichle, Barbara

doi:10.1026/0942-5403.16.4.240

Cited by 26 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Besides methodological considerations related to sampling fluctuations and meaningful variations (Fontaine, Poortinga, Delbeke, & Schwartz, 2008), variables influencing the transmission of values have to be considered. The dynamic relationship between parenting styles and children’s values and psychosocial behavior (Franiek & Reichle, 2007), the impact of parental goals and acculturation contexts on value transmission (Phalet & Schönpflug, 2001), conditions favorable for value transmission in a particular socioeconomic and cultural context (Boehnke, 2001; Schönpflug, 2001), dynamic aspects of the parent-child relationship (Grusec, Goodnow, & Kuczynski, 2000), perception and acceptance of parental values, parent-child value congruence, and the choice of school environments (Knafo, 2003) are only a few of the variables mentioned in the literature. Clarifying the relationship between these variables and the development and differentiation of value preferences is a challenging task for future research.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Children’s Value Structures and Value Preferences

Bilsky

Döring

Beeck

et al. 2013

Swiss Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contrary to those of adults and adolescents, children’s value structures and value preferences have rarely been investigated. This paper bridges this gap by building on Schwartz’s (1992 ) value theory. We present two studies: one in which children from Germany, Portugal, and Chile, aged 10 to 12 years, completed the Portrait Values Questionnaire ( Schwartz et al., 2001 ); and one in which children from Germany and France, aged 7 to 12 years, completed the Picture-Based Value Survey for Children ( Döring, Blauensteiner, Aryus, Drögekamp, & Bilsky, 2010 ). Theory-based multidimensional scaling analyses revealed differentiated value structures in both studies. Findings on children’s value preferences converged with evidence from adult samples ( Schwartz & Bardi, 2001 ). The results are discussed in light of the present state of knowledge and consequences for future research.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Children’s Value Structures and Value Preferences

Bilsky

Döring

Beeck

et al. 2013

Swiss Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For the German APQ, specifically, the psychometric properties have been reported to be satisfactory (Reichle & Franiek, 2009). Supporting the ecological validity of this measure, inconsistent parenting reported by parents was related to children’s social competence, aggressive behaviors, and hyperactivity (Franiek & Reichle, 2007). Cronbach’s alpha in the present study was α = .61.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 86%

The power motive and parenting style—Is incongruence related to inconsistency?

Zemp¹,

Backes²,

Brandstätter³

2017

Motivation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The impact of motive incongruence on psychological and physical well-being has received considerable research attention during the past several years. However, little headway has been made to date in declaring the role of incongruence in the power motive for interpersonal behavior, such as parenting. Parenting is one of the most important domains of social interaction inherently related to the power motive. In this study, we examined incongruence in the implicit (nPower) and the explicit power motive system (sanPower) as predictor of inconsistent parenting in 36 mothers. The results suggest that nPower and sanPower combine to explain variance in mothers' inconsistent parenting. Specifically, inconsistent parenting of mothers was associated with the interaction of high levels in nPower and low levels in sanPower. Given the nature of this incongruent motive base, their parenting behavior is not consistent over time and situations. The present study extends previous research on motive incongruence and provides potential implications for the family adjustment.

show abstract

“…The Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ) [ 177 , 178 ] will be adminstered to assess six parenting constructs: (1) Parent Involvement, (2) Positive Parenting, (3) Poor Monitoring/Supervision, (4) Inconsistent Discipline, (5) Corporal Punishment, and (6) Other Discipline Practices. Parents and older children will serve as informants.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analyzing pathways from childhood maltreatment to internalizing symptoms and disorders in children and adolescents (AMIS): a study protocol

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundEffective interventions for maltreated children are impeded by gaps in our knowledge of the etiopathogenic mechanisms leading from maltreatment to mental disorders. Although some studies have already identified individual risk factors, there is a lack of large-scale multilevel research on how psychosocial, neurobiological, and genetic factors act in concert to modulate risk of internalizing psychopathology in childhood following maltreatment. To help close this gap, we aim to delineate gender-specific pathways from maltreatment to psychological disorder/resilience. To this end, we examine the interplay of specific maltreatment characteristics and psychological, endocrine, metabolomic, and (epi-)genomic stress response patterns as well as cognitive-emotional/social processes as determinants of developmental outcome. Specifically, we will explore endocrine, metabolomic, and epigenetic mechanisms leading from maltreatment to a higher risk of depression and anxiety disorders.Methods/designFour large samples amounting to a total of N = 920 children aged 4–16 years will be assessed: Two cohorts with prior internalizing psychopathology and controls will be checked for maltreatment and two cohorts with substantiated maltreatment will be checked for internalizing (and externalizing) psychopathology. We will apply a multi-source (interview, questionnaires, official records), multi-informant strategy (parents, children, teachers) to assess maltreatment characteristics (e.g., subtypes, developmental timing, chronicity) and psychopathological symptoms, supplemented with multiple measurements of risk and protective factors and cutting-edge laboratory analyses of endocrine, steroid metabolomic and epigenetic factors. As previous assessments in the two largest samples are already available, longitudinal data will be generated within the three year study period.DiscussionOur results will lay the empirical foundation for (a) detection of early biopsychosocial markers, (b) development of screening measures, and (c) multisystem-oriented interventions in the wake of maltreatment.

show abstract

Elterliches Erziehungsverhalten und Sozialverhalten im Grundschulalter

Cited by 26 publications

References 15 publications

Assessment of Children’s Value Structures and Value Preferences

Assessment of Children’s Value Structures and Value Preferences

The power motive and parenting style—Is incongruence related to inconsistency?

Analyzing pathways from childhood maltreatment to internalizing symptoms and disorders in children and adolescents (AMIS): a study protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About