1995
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidating the Folding Problem of Helical Peptides using Empirical Parameters. II†. Helix Macrodipole Effects and Rational Modification of the Helical Content of Natural Peptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

24
251
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
24
251
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2C). Helix content and relative secondary shifts for both mutations are consistent with predictions made by AGADIR (Table I) (40,41,42).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…2C). Helix content and relative secondary shifts for both mutations are consistent with predictions made by AGADIR (Table I) (40,41,42).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Not surprisingly, these electrostatically complementary residues are essentially conserved in all known c-Myb and CBP/p300 sequences (28). Table S1 reports the top six point mutant candidates that were predicted from AGADIR (68)(69)(70)(71)(72) to increase the helical propensity of the α 3 helix and therefore can potentially affect cooperative binding (SI Text). Out of all of the C-terminal residues located in the α 3 helix that make no intermolecular native contacts with either c-Myb or MLL, only six point mutations at either Lys667 or Ser670 caused a significant increase in the predicted helicity of α 3 (∼3.5-12.7%) relative to the wild-type sequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4): A mutation destabilizes one end of the molecule, causing folding flux through the other end of the molecule. The initiation site for folding of wild-type myotrophin does not correlate with intrinsic helical propensity [as predicted by the program AGADIR (24,25)], which is below 5% for all residues except those in the second helix of ANK II for which the propensity rises to Ϸ15%. Interestingly, folding appears to be initiated preferentially at the terminal rather than internal repeats of myotrophin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%