1999
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.10.4.1133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidation of a PTS–Carbohydrate Chemotactic Signal Pathway inEscherichia coliUsing a Time-resolved Behavioral Assay

Abstract: Chemotaxis of Escherichia coli toward phosphotransferase systems (PTSs)-carbohydrates requires phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent PTSs as well as the chemotaxis response regulator CheY and its kinase, CheA. Responses initiated by flash photorelease of a PTS substrates D-glucose and its nonmetabolizable analog methyl alpha-D-glucopyranoside were measured with 33-ms time resolution using computer-assisted motion analysis. This, together with chemotactic mutants, has allowed us to map out and characterize the PTS chem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was established that chemotaxis towards PTS sugars at relatively high concentrations (Ͼ1 mM) is also mediated by the chemoreceptors Aer and Tsr (296), which sense redox state and proton motive force, respectively (865). In E. coli, chemotaxis by PTS sugars can be abolished by knocking out CheA, CheY, CheW, EI, HPr, or the corresponding sugar-specific EII complexes, whereas the removal of the MCPs, CheR, or CheB has no significant effect (8,297,460,462,498,550,609,641,745,863,864; see also reference 678). Despite the fact that PTS-mediated sugar uptake and Che protein-mediated chemotaxis involve similar phosphoryl transfer reactions, no phosphoryl transfer between PTS components and Che proteins has been demonstrated (379).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was established that chemotaxis towards PTS sugars at relatively high concentrations (Ͼ1 mM) is also mediated by the chemoreceptors Aer and Tsr (296), which sense redox state and proton motive force, respectively (865). In E. coli, chemotaxis by PTS sugars can be abolished by knocking out CheA, CheY, CheW, EI, HPr, or the corresponding sugar-specific EII complexes, whereas the removal of the MCPs, CheR, or CheB has no significant effect (8,297,460,462,498,550,609,641,745,863,864; see also reference 678). Despite the fact that PTS-mediated sugar uptake and Che protein-mediated chemotaxis involve similar phosphoryl transfer reactions, no phosphoryl transfer between PTS components and Che proteins has been demonstrated (379).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Lux et al 1999). This scheme is not applicable for B. subtilis as the dephosphorylation of CheY would lead to tumbling.…”
Section: Discussion About Mcpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dephosphorylated state of EIIA component, which is predominant during active uptake of the PTS dependent substrates, correlates with low PrfA activity and vice versa (46). Second, in E. coli, dephosphorylated EI, at a high glucose level, inhibits the chemotaxis protein, CheA, changing the motility pattern of the cell in such a way that it is able to approach the source of food (47). Not only that, but the cAMP-independent catabolite repression control protein Crc of P. aeruginosa is necessary for the formation of biofilm (48).…”
Section: Role Of Ccr Machinery Beyond Sugar Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%