2018
DOI: 10.1093/jogss/ogy026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedded Deception: Interpersonal Trust, Cooperative Expectations, and the Sharing of Fabricated Intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, only states with very close personal ties and strong reputations tend to share intelligence with one another (Brown & Farrington 2017). States cannot simply provide their conclusions about other states' compliance with norms and laws, because they have incentives to misrepresent their information and/or may reach the wrong conclusions (Walsh 2009, Jervis 2010, Rovner 2011, Yarhi-Milo 2013a, Brown et al 2019). However, Carnegie & Carson (2019a show that when IOs including the International Atomic Energy Agency, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda can protect sensitive information, information sharing increases, along with cooperation in nuclear enforcement and war crime prosecutions.…”
Section: Protect Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, only states with very close personal ties and strong reputations tend to share intelligence with one another (Brown & Farrington 2017). States cannot simply provide their conclusions about other states' compliance with norms and laws, because they have incentives to misrepresent their information and/or may reach the wrong conclusions (Walsh 2009, Jervis 2010, Rovner 2011, Yarhi-Milo 2013a, Brown et al 2019). However, Carnegie & Carson (2019a show that when IOs including the International Atomic Energy Agency, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda can protect sensitive information, information sharing increases, along with cooperation in nuclear enforcement and war crime prosecutions.…”
Section: Protect Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%