“…• Benefits: -market access (Frynas, Mellahi, & Pigman, 2006;Malik & Kotabe, 2009;Zhu & Chung, 2014) -influence on regulations (Gomez & Jomo, 1997;Zheng, Singh, & Chung, 2017) -legitimacy (Marquis & Qian, 2014) privileged access to resources e.g., access to credit (Haveman et al, 2017;Khwaja & Mian, 2005;Leuz & Oberholzer-Gee, 2006); government contract (Johnson & Mitton, 2003) -filling institutional void as intermediaries (Luo & Chung, 2005;Okhmatovskiy, 2010;Peng & Luo, 2000) • Costs/risks: -government intervention (Okhmatovskiy, 2010) -appropriation of firm wealth by blockholders (Sun et al, 2016) -closer monitoring by governments (Marquis & Qian, 2014) -hinders growth during political change (Siegel, 2007) -limits knowledge exchange with market actors (Li, Xia, & Zajac, 2018) • Benefits: -privileged access to resources (Johnson & Ni, 2015;Ni & Zhan, 2017;Zhan & Tang, 2016) -policy advocacy and broadened service scope (Zhan & Tang, 2016) • Costs/risks: -legitimacy concerns (Tortajada, 2016) -independence concerns (Brinkerhoff, 1999) a Cross-country studies (e.g., Faccio, 2006) are not included in this table. propose that ties with the government can help charities to raise funds from business. They do so by conferring political legitimacy to corporations that donate to approved causes.…”