Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
After the Seveso disaster occurred more than 40 years ago, there has been an increasing awareness of the potential impacts that similar accident events can occur in a wide range of process establishments, where the handling and production of hazardous substances pose a real threat to society and the environment. In these industrial sites denominated "Seveso sites," the urgent need for an effective strategy emerged markedly to handle hazardous activities and to ensure safe conditions. Since then, the main challenging research issues have focused on how to prevent such accident events and how to mitigate their consequences leading to the development of many risk assessment methodologies. In recent years, researchers and practitioners have tried to provide useful overviews of the existing risk assessment methodologies proposing several reviews. However, these reviews are not exhaustive because they are either dated or focus only on one specific topic (e.g., liquefied natural gas, domino effect, etc.). This work aims to overcome the limitations of the current reviews by providing an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of the risk assessment methodologies for handling hazardous substances within the European industry. In particular, we have focused on the current techniques for hazards and accident scenarios identification, as well as probability and consequence analyses for both onshore and offshore installations. Thus, we have identified the research streams that have characterized the activities of researchers and practitioners over the years, and we have then presented and discussed the different risk assessment methodologies available concerning the research stream that they belong to.
After the Seveso disaster occurred more than 40 years ago, there has been an increasing awareness of the potential impacts that similar accident events can occur in a wide range of process establishments, where the handling and production of hazardous substances pose a real threat to society and the environment. In these industrial sites denominated "Seveso sites," the urgent need for an effective strategy emerged markedly to handle hazardous activities and to ensure safe conditions. Since then, the main challenging research issues have focused on how to prevent such accident events and how to mitigate their consequences leading to the development of many risk assessment methodologies. In recent years, researchers and practitioners have tried to provide useful overviews of the existing risk assessment methodologies proposing several reviews. However, these reviews are not exhaustive because they are either dated or focus only on one specific topic (e.g., liquefied natural gas, domino effect, etc.). This work aims to overcome the limitations of the current reviews by providing an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of the risk assessment methodologies for handling hazardous substances within the European industry. In particular, we have focused on the current techniques for hazards and accident scenarios identification, as well as probability and consequence analyses for both onshore and offshore installations. Thus, we have identified the research streams that have characterized the activities of researchers and practitioners over the years, and we have then presented and discussed the different risk assessment methodologies available concerning the research stream that they belong to.
Prevention of workplace accidents remains a challenge to the Oil and Gas industry to avoid interruptions to business, safeguarding their employees and maintaining their reputation. The Oil and Gas Industry is challenged by repetition of incidents, despite addressing root causes of incidents. Typically incident investigations highlight gaps in the implementation of an HSE Management System and often corrective actions include revision of procedures, more training, enhancements in work planning, design review and procurement of new tools. Analysis of over 500 Oil & Gas incidents investigation was carried and the repetition of incidents was noted despite addressing the identified gaps and further linkage of human factors with causes and corrective actions was further analysed. An analysis of findings and causes of incidents was carried out and human factors such as incorrect decision, improperly performed action, improper lack of action and presence of error inducing precursors were re-mapped to assess effectives of the investigations. It indicated that over 80% of drilling incidents were due to human factors and the following were the repetitive human factors issues leading to majority of incidents: Work load and task decisionMotivation and attentionCompetence and learningCommunication Remapping of conventional causes with human factors guidelines, highlighted consistent patterns of causation of incidents where multiple human factors criteria were formerly overlooked, led to these losses. Based on the analysis, the incident investigation training curriculum was revised to include human factors and error recovery, which was often, if not totally overlooked, was identified as a theme for corrective actions. It was noted that corrective actions (75%) were ineffective, as those actions were not directed toward human factors. It has prompted organizations to change the way incidents were investigated and the need of linking system causes with specific human factors deficiencies. It was found that 80% of drilling related incidents within ADNOC were triggered by unsafe actions and 62% of unsafe actions were due to human error & mistakes and 40% of drilling incidents were triggered by inattention/lack of awareness/unintentional human errors and violations by individuals, supervisors and by the group amounted to 15% of all immediate causes; and ack of knowledge of hazards present accounted for 14% of all immediate causes. Inadequate Identification of Worksite/Job Hazards accounted for 13% of overall drilling incident root causes and root causes associated with Human Factors contributed to 50% of all drilling incidents. This approach has led to changes in incident investigation curriculum in areas such as interviewing witnesses, identification of errors and identification of corrective actions. List of incident causes has been disintegrated to focus on type of error and error inducing factors. This novel approach focused on causes and provided efficient corrective actions to avoid recurrence of incidents. Analysis indicated that employee's low risk perception was due to lack identification of work site/job hazards followed by lack of leadership were the predominant root causes of incidents.
Oil & Gas operations place a high focus on the prevention of incidents to avoid interruptions to operations, safety of staff and stakeholders, and safeguard their reputation. Incidents and high potential near miss events are investigated mainly to identify the causes triggering the accident and to identify corrective actions to prevent such accidents to reoccur. The repetition of similar incidents is indicative of gaps in incident investigation process to identify root causes and effective implementation of recommendations. Often well control incidents are investigated as a single incident, missing overall interactions between organizational behaviours over an extended period. An extended analysis of Twenty-five (25) well control incidents within Upstream Oil & Gas companies was conducted to assess repetition of causes and regrouping of causes to assess linkage with well control barrier analysis. ADNOC has a matured HSE management system supported by HSE & operation standards and dedicated framework for competency assurance, well barriers, incident management and process safety supporting ADNOC Upstream Group Companies (GC) to control and prevent well control incidents. Mainly due to the effectiveness of management frameworks for incident management, Operations excellence, process safety and well barriers, ADNOC has not experience any blowout event over the last 10 years during drilling or well interventions. A review of well control incidents and interviews with professionals including drilling engineers, sub surface specialists, drilling supervisors, contractors and consultants indicated the following areas for development: Inadequate identification/correction of worksite/job hazards, particularly in connection with changes to plans Inadequate competency, gaps in communication and change management Gaps in drilling programmes and uncertainty in predicting reservoir conditions resulted in insufficient margin between pore and cracking pressures Encountering unexpected shallow gas pockets Inadequacy in risk assessments followed by gaps in competence (training and/or experience) of assigned staff/crew and communication are the most recurring underlying causes. Based on the findings, review and analysis of investigation the following are the key recommendations to address/prevent well control events: Enhance training efforts for personnel (staff & rig crew) involved in well control situations Conduct awareness sessions on risk management and operational risk during drilling and well intervention Enhance inspection of measures adopted for verification of well barriers, in all operations Adopt measures to build competence and share experience and knowledge. Schedule internal seminars on operational topics focusing on drilling operations and high risk well intervention This approach of linking human factors in design and planning could potentially improve overall HSE performance by 15-25% and eliminate well blowout incidents.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.