2020
DOI: 10.3390/jmse8121010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedding of a Blade-Element Analytical Model into the SHYFEM Marine Circulation Code to Predict the Performance of Cross-Flow Turbines

Abstract: Our aim was to embed a 2D analytical model of a cross-flow tidal turbine inside the open-source SHYFEM marine circulation code. Other studies on the environmental impact of Tidal Energy Converters use marine circulation codes with simplified approaches: performance coefficients are fixed a priori regardless of the operating conditions and turbine geometrical parameters, and usually, the computational grid is so coarse that the device occupies one or few cells. In this work, a hybrid analytical computational fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using a sliding mesh, to obtain a satisfactory numeric convergence the time-step should not be larger than the time required for advance the mobile interface by a distance corresponding to one cell thus, in order to consider the smallest cell at the interface, a time-step corresponding to 0.5° of revolution was adopted. The overall validation of the 2D CFD model has been described in a previous article [22] in comparison to the experimental data by Bravo et al [23], whereas the validation of the 3D CFD model has been done versus the wind-tunnel velocity profiles achieved by Vergaerde et al [24] at several locations downstream a two straight bladed turbine (details of the validation in [25]).…”
Section: Dmst Sub-modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using a sliding mesh, to obtain a satisfactory numeric convergence the time-step should not be larger than the time required for advance the mobile interface by a distance corresponding to one cell thus, in order to consider the smallest cell at the interface, a time-step corresponding to 0.5° of revolution was adopted. The overall validation of the 2D CFD model has been described in a previous article [22] in comparison to the experimental data by Bravo et al [23], whereas the validation of the 3D CFD model has been done versus the wind-tunnel velocity profiles achieved by Vergaerde et al [24] at several locations downstream a two straight bladed turbine (details of the validation in [25]).…”
Section: Dmst Sub-modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we describe an easy methodology based on this kind of approach. Only after the turbine concept has already been inferred, the chosen turbine can be checked inside the marine code (Thiébot et al 2020;Pucci et al 2020). This will require very fine grids and long computation times, to assess the environmental impacts of a certain tidal farm layout.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%