2021
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v35i1.16134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embracing Domain Differences in Fake News: Cross-domain Fake News Detection using Multi-modal Data

Abstract: With the rapid evolution of social media, fake news has become a significant social problem, which cannot be addressed in a timely manner using manual investigation. This has motivated numerous studies on automating fake news detection. Most studies explore supervised training models with different modalities (e.g., text, images, and propagation networks) of news records to identify fake news. However, the performance of such techniques generally drops if news records are coming from different domains (e.g., p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shu et al [25] develop a sentence-comment co-attention network to exploit news content and user comments to jointly capture check-worthy sentences and user comments for fake news detection. Silva et al [10] find that news records from different domains have significantly different word usage and propagation patterns. Therefore, the constructed model retains the knowledge of a specific domain to detect fake news from different domains effectively.…”
Section: Mixed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shu et al [25] develop a sentence-comment co-attention network to exploit news content and user comments to jointly capture check-worthy sentences and user comments for fake news detection. Silva et al [10] find that news records from different domains have significantly different word usage and propagation patterns. Therefore, the constructed model retains the knowledge of a specific domain to detect fake news from different domains effectively.…”
Section: Mixed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these methods are effective for fake news detection, they cannot be used alone to improve detection accuracy further. Therefore, some hybrid methods [10,11] come into being. By combining news content, propagation structure, social context, and source information for fake news detection, news features are fully characterized, greatly improving the detection effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closely related to our topic is fake news detection. [38] trains an event discriminator to overlook domain-specific knowledge under the multi-modal setting, [39] formulates domain-agnostic fake news detection as a continual learning problem, [37] studies the case with limited labeling budget, and [7,36] take advantage of auxiliary user descriptions and large-scale user corpus.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are two main types of detection models from the perspective of topic distribution: in-topic models and cross-topic models (Ren et al, 2021). (1) In-topic models focus on scenarios where topics of the training and test data are same (Silva et al, 2021;Song et al, 2021), that is, the topics in the test set are seen. (2) Cross-topic models focus on scenarios where topics of the training and test data are different (Wang et al, 2018;Ren et al, 2021), which means the topics in the test data are unseen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that the reasons for the above phenomenon are as follows. (1) The performance of the in-topic model benefits from prior knowledge of the data (Ren et al, 2021;Silva et al, 2021), also known as topic-specific features, such as specific topic words. This prior knowledge cannot be transferred to new topics due to differences between topic features, resulting in poor generalisation of in-topic models to unseen topics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%