2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMCBOW-GPCR: A method for identifying G-protein coupled receptors based on word embedding and wordbooks

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a new solution idea was proposed, which used the product of the average of the input context word vectors and the weights from the input layer to the hidden layer as input and the average of the context word vectors as output, and used the context in this way to predict the current word, which was the continuous bag-of-words model, or CBOW for short ( Mikolov et al, 2013 ). Based on CBOW model, we constructed two different words embedded in wordbooks for training model and the corresponding feature vectors were generated using them ( Qiu et al, 2021 ). The training process is as follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a new solution idea was proposed, which used the product of the average of the input context word vectors and the weights from the input layer to the hidden layer as input and the average of the context word vectors as output, and used the context in this way to predict the current word, which was the continuous bag-of-words model, or CBOW for short ( Mikolov et al, 2013 ). Based on CBOW model, we constructed two different words embedded in wordbooks for training model and the corresponding feature vectors were generated using them ( Qiu et al, 2021 ). The training process is as follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI models have been used to accurately distinguish GPCRs from non‐GPCRs and to further classify GPCRs into families, subfamilies, sub‐subfamilies and subtypes. The models use a variety of data for the input, including amino acid sequences or structural data derived from X‐ray crystallography, cryo‐electron microscopy (cryoEM) or molecular dynamics simulation experiments (Ao et al, 2020; Begum et al, 2020; Gu et al, 2020; Li et al, 2017; Liao et al, 2016; Naveed & Khan, 2012; Nie et al, 2015; Peng et al, 2010; Qiu et al, 2021; Wang et al, 2022; Zia‐Ur‐Rehman & Khan, 2012). A machine learning model, trained using the helical and loop information from X‐ray crystal structures, can distinguish active and inactive states of class A GPCRs (Bemister‐Buffington et al, 2020).…”
Section: At What Stages Can Ai Be Employed To Accelerate the Gpcr Dru...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations that stand on the static crystal structure can predict atomic-level motion and capture the dynamic information of conformational transitions [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] . As a result of computation and algorithmic promotion, MD simulations have become an important source of complementary information in crystallography and a primary tool for mechanism research [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [65] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%