2019
DOI: 10.1101/676874
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence timing and voltinism of phantom midges, Chaoborus spp., in the UK

Abstract: 20 After introduction of overwintered fourth instar larvae (2027 in total), emergence timing of adult 21 Chaoborus spp. (Diptera: Chaoboridae) was investigated in four outdoor freshwater microcosms in 22 the UK in 2017. Adults started emerging on 13 April and emergence reached a peak on 2 May. The 23 majority of emergence was completed by 3 June. Emergence rates for each microcosm ranged from 24 51.4% to 66.2% with a mean of 60.9%. The great majority of emerged adults were C. obscuripes 25 (99.68%). Males appe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Cloeon dipterum, this variability might be explained by differences in physical parameters (e.g. water temperature) that not only affect timing of emergence but also length and number of generations per year (Brittain 1982, Ouimet 2008, Cockroft et al 2019. Other factors contributing to variability in macroinvertebrate abundance and abundance dynamics could include differences in food source availability, macrophyte-based habitat structures and presence or absence of overwintering generations (O'Connor 1991, Leszczyńska et al 2017), all of which are likely to differ among ponds of different ages and thus successional stages (Hassall et al 2012, Sferra et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Cloeon dipterum, this variability might be explained by differences in physical parameters (e.g. water temperature) that not only affect timing of emergence but also length and number of generations per year (Brittain 1982, Ouimet 2008, Cockroft et al 2019. Other factors contributing to variability in macroinvertebrate abundance and abundance dynamics could include differences in food source availability, macrophyte-based habitat structures and presence or absence of overwintering generations (O'Connor 1991, Leszczyńska et al 2017), all of which are likely to differ among ponds of different ages and thus successional stages (Hassall et al 2012, Sferra et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%