2018
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency fluid bolus therapy studies: first do no harm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The wider relevance of these findings has been hotly debated. 2 The Fluids in Shock study is an English pilot study 3 ; it randomised 75 children presenting to emergency departments with clinical sepsis and shock persisting after a fluid bolus of 20 mL/kg, to further fluid boluses of either 10 or 20 mL/kg every 15 min for up to 4 h if still shocked. 3 Participants were not as unwell as expected, there were no deaths and the authors concluded a larger UK trial was not feasible.…”
Section: Fluid Resuscitation In Early Septic Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The wider relevance of these findings has been hotly debated. 2 The Fluids in Shock study is an English pilot study 3 ; it randomised 75 children presenting to emergency departments with clinical sepsis and shock persisting after a fluid bolus of 20 mL/kg, to further fluid boluses of either 10 or 20 mL/kg every 15 min for up to 4 h if still shocked. 3 Participants were not as unwell as expected, there were no deaths and the authors concluded a larger UK trial was not feasible.…”
Section: Fluid Resuscitation In Early Septic Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FEAST trial, a randomised controlled trial conducted in East Africa, found surprisingly that the 48‐h and 28‐day mortality was significantly higher in children with fever and shock given a 20 mL/kg bolus of either 5% albumin or 0.9% saline than in those not given a bolus . The excess mortality was due to cardiovascular collapse . The wider relevance of these findings has been hotly debated .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excess mortality was due to cardiovascular collapse . The wider relevance of these findings has been hotly debated . The Fluids in Shock study is an English pilot study; it randomised 75 children presenting to emergency departments with clinical sepsis and shock persisting after a fluid bolus of 20 mL/kg, to further fluid boluses of either 10 or 20 mL/kg every 15 min for up to 4 h if still shocked .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation