2010
DOI: 10.1258/shorts.2010.010033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergent Caesarean section in parturient with congenital complete atrioventricular block

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pregnant women with a pacemaker who underwent vaginal delivery tolerated the stress of labor well. [4][5][6] Pacemaker insertion per se is not an indication for cesarean section unless there are other obstetric causes for a cesarean section, as in our case. Regional anesthesia can be safely instituted in women where rate and rhythm is maintained by a pacemaker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Pregnant women with a pacemaker who underwent vaginal delivery tolerated the stress of labor well. [4][5][6] Pacemaker insertion per se is not an indication for cesarean section unless there are other obstetric causes for a cesarean section, as in our case. Regional anesthesia can be safely instituted in women where rate and rhythm is maintained by a pacemaker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…On review of literature, there is no consensus regarding the best mode of delivery for these women. Pregnant women with a pacemaker who underwent vaginal delivery tolerated the stress of labor well 4–6 . Pacemaker insertion per se is not an indication for cesarean section unless there are other obstetric causes for a cesarean section, as in our case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations