2016
DOI: 10.1670/14-151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergent Vegetation Coverage and Human Activities Influence Oviposition Microhabitat Selection by Invasive Bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) in Southwestern China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the vegetation cover on the surface of the pond, which was not chosen as a significant positive variable in this study by a small margin (95% CI=−0.01-1.86) (Table 1), it is often detected as a significant positive value for their pond selectivity (Bury and Whelan, 1984;Minowa et al, 2008). In previous studies, where vegetation cover was a significant positive variable in the presence of adults or eggs, the mean vegetation coverage in the ponds surveyed was greater than 30% (Minowa et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2016), and Clarkson and Devos (1986) showed that American bullfrog presence was significantly associated with 50% or more bank cover provided by emergent aquatic vegetation (reeds). On the other hand, the mean vegetation coverage was 12.7% in this study and such low vegetation coverage probably did not significantly affect bullfrog habitat selectivity.…”
Section: Habitat Pond Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…As for the vegetation cover on the surface of the pond, which was not chosen as a significant positive variable in this study by a small margin (95% CI=−0.01-1.86) (Table 1), it is often detected as a significant positive value for their pond selectivity (Bury and Whelan, 1984;Minowa et al, 2008). In previous studies, where vegetation cover was a significant positive variable in the presence of adults or eggs, the mean vegetation coverage in the ponds surveyed was greater than 30% (Minowa et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2016), and Clarkson and Devos (1986) showed that American bullfrog presence was significantly associated with 50% or more bank cover provided by emergent aquatic vegetation (reeds). On the other hand, the mean vegetation coverage was 12.7% in this study and such low vegetation coverage probably did not significantly affect bullfrog habitat selectivity.…”
Section: Habitat Pond Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Because the biotopes had permanent lentic environments, they were inhabited by invasive alien animals that favor permanent water environments (Lithobates catesbeianus and Procambarus clarkii). These alien species strongly affect native amphibians through predation (Cruz and Rebelo 2005;Liu et al 2015) and might decrease the abundance of juvenile P. p. brevipodus in the biotope area. Additionally, as P. p. brevipodus is an opportunistic predator, the aggregation of larger individuals in the biotopes might also decrease juveniles via cannibalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a Mann-Whitney U test to compare the differences in the 14 continuous habitat variables between blue sheep and Alashan red deer, then used the Chi-square test to analyze whether there are differences in the selection of five categorical variables. Principal component analysis was used to describe the vegetation characteristics of the habitat utilized by the sheep and deer (Liu et al 2016). We did not rotate the variables and only extracted components that had eigenvalues ≥ 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%