2018
DOI: 10.1177/0952076717753279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging environmental Multi-Level Governance in China? Environmental protests, public participation and local institution-building

Abstract: Chinese state reforms have resulted in a horizontal and vertical diffusion of actors in policymaking and policy implementation, leading to the creation of new collaborative institutions between government and non-government actors. At the non-governmental level, this has inter alia enabled the development of non-governmental organizations and the passage of a raft of legislation for public participation and access to information. However, the political and legal constraints imposed by the authoritarian system … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas earlier reforms were focused on internal capacity building to ensure that the civil service could keep up with economic development, power sharing and participation have garnered support as means to provide legitimacy and higher citizen satisfaction (Xue and Liou ). Hensengerth and Lu (, 122) noted that “China, recognizing the severity of environmental degradation and the need to improve environmental governance to avert crises, the central government has introduced legislation for public participation in environmental decision‐making.” As the Chinese government still lacks experience and expertise in managing networks (Lu ), it is essential that supervisors in public agencies encourage their employees to initiate and maintain relationships with contacts outside their organizations. To avoid abuses, leaders should also articulate the boundaries of networking activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas earlier reforms were focused on internal capacity building to ensure that the civil service could keep up with economic development, power sharing and participation have garnered support as means to provide legitimacy and higher citizen satisfaction (Xue and Liou ). Hensengerth and Lu (, 122) noted that “China, recognizing the severity of environmental degradation and the need to improve environmental governance to avert crises, the central government has introduced legislation for public participation in environmental decision‐making.” As the Chinese government still lacks experience and expertise in managing networks (Lu ), it is essential that supervisors in public agencies encourage their employees to initiate and maintain relationships with contacts outside their organizations. To avoid abuses, leaders should also articulate the boundaries of networking activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hensengerth et al (2019) point out public participation legislation has suffered from an implementation gap, leading to the proliferation of environmental protests across China. There are indications that protests may result in the improvement and creation of local institutions that facilitate public participation, which in turn help to foster a new model of governance that contains features of multi-level governance [22].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi-level governance system, which refers to a cooperative governance system that involves different governance actors on different levels of society to deal with common properties [76], should be introduced to facilitate the coordination between governments and among local farmers, other stakeholders, and government agencies. Although it may be challenging when such a governance system is implemented in the Chinese context, it has become a need and is both appropriate and feasible as argued in recent papers by Ongaro et al [77] and others [78]. Building a multi-level governance system needs to consider issues relevant to horizontal and vertical coordination among actors, which means that actors should be able to cooperate within the same level and across different administrative and jurisdictional scales.…”
Section: Problems With Financial Policy Coordination Between Central mentioning
confidence: 99%