2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging green-tech specializations and clusters – A network analysis on technological innovation at the metropolitan level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevant policies include demand-side instruments (public procurement, 'green' infrastructure investment), supply-side instruments (financial subsidies to infant industries, skills and qualifications, public R&D) and support of knowledge exchange via such 'horizontal platforms'. Analyses of green-tech clusters in metropolitan areas (Marra, Antonelli, & Pozzi, 2017) and industrial regions (Tödtling, Höglinger, Sinozic, & Auer, 2014) provide support for the view that cross-industrial knowledge circulation and policies aiming to facilitate such flows are superior to traditional cluster approaches. These studies also point to the significance of other policy measures like environmental standards, public demand and procurement (Tödtling et al, 2014) and examine the gradual transformation of green-tech clusters into open cross-industry platforms that combine competences, specializations and capabilities from several industries, such as software, transportation, analytics, construction and biotechnology (Marra et al, 2017).…”
Section: Traditional Systemic Approaches and Policiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Relevant policies include demand-side instruments (public procurement, 'green' infrastructure investment), supply-side instruments (financial subsidies to infant industries, skills and qualifications, public R&D) and support of knowledge exchange via such 'horizontal platforms'. Analyses of green-tech clusters in metropolitan areas (Marra, Antonelli, & Pozzi, 2017) and industrial regions (Tödtling, Höglinger, Sinozic, & Auer, 2014) provide support for the view that cross-industrial knowledge circulation and policies aiming to facilitate such flows are superior to traditional cluster approaches. These studies also point to the significance of other policy measures like environmental standards, public demand and procurement (Tödtling et al, 2014) and examine the gradual transformation of green-tech clusters into open cross-industry platforms that combine competences, specializations and capabilities from several industries, such as software, transportation, analytics, construction and biotechnology (Marra et al, 2017).…”
Section: Traditional Systemic Approaches and Policiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, the green entrepreneurship of Guanghe Energy covers the business of these two industries, showing a certain degree of typicality. Secondly, most of the green entrepreneurial enterprises are innovative new ventures or small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) that are able to respond more positively to the demand for green products than large ones in almost any market segment [2,22]. As a mid-sized enterprise that continuously undertakes green entrepreneurship, Guanghe Energy has entered the construction industry after undertaking green entrepreneurship in the energy industry.…”
Section: Methods and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the green entrepreneurial enterprises are innovative new ventures or small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) that are able to respond more positively to the demand for green products than large ones in almost any market segment, but they also often face higher technical uncertainty [2,22]. For green entrepreneurial enterprises, they need to overcome the technological complexity in pursuing innovation achievements, such as green products and services.…”
Section: Model Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metadata are proxies of firms' products, services, technologies and, more generally, refer to the know‐how, capabilities and knowledge on which firms build their own specializations. Such information, bottom‐up (generated by companies' owners and employees, and other contributors) and up‐to‐date, is at a very detailed level and much more informative than SIC codes, as showed by the relevant and recent literature (Marra et al, ; Marra, Antonelli, & Pozzi, ; Nathan & Rosso, ; Nathan, Rosso, & Bouet, ; Papagiannidis, See‐To, Assimakopoulos, & Yang, ; Tech City, ; Tech City, ).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%