2015 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/isemc.2015.7256283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMI-receiver simulation model with quasi-peak detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency responses of IF bandpass and window function filters can be found in [25]. Further details about detector models have been discussed in [27][28][29]. Hence, is not covered in this paper.…”
Section: Processing Highly Volatile Sinusoidal Components In Emi Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency responses of IF bandpass and window function filters can be found in [25]. Further details about detector models have been discussed in [27][28][29]. Hence, is not covered in this paper.…”
Section: Processing Highly Volatile Sinusoidal Components In Emi Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TD data was processed using short-time fast Fourier transform (STFFT) in MATLAB. Two types of detectors, peak and average, were used in accordance to [14] to generate realtime FD plots that could then be compared with the standard limit lines.…”
Section: Measurement Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interference at low Pulse Repetition Frequencies (PRFs) is said to be subjectively less annoying on radio reception than that at high PRFs. Therefore, the quasi-peak response de-emphasizes the peak response at low PRFs, or to put it another way, pulse-type emissions will be treated more leniently by a quasi-peak measurement than by a peak measurement [5].…”
Section: Quasi-peakmentioning
confidence: 99%