2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emission rates of regulated pollutants from on-road heavy-duty diesel vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that, compared to cruising on freeways, HDDVs driving at low speeds and frequent acceleration in congested traffic conditions may result in higher NO x emissions, which is similar to the result by other researchers (17).…”
Section: Modal Average Emission Rates Estimatessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This implies that, compared to cruising on freeways, HDDVs driving at low speeds and frequent acceleration in congested traffic conditions may result in higher NO x emissions, which is similar to the result by other researchers (17).…”
Section: Modal Average Emission Rates Estimatessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The variability of emissions on vehicle speed and engine load has been found to be higher when emissions are expressed by distance travelled as compared to fuel consumed. A similar dependency of the effects of driving conditions (categorized for example by idling, acceleration and cruising modes) on vehicle emissions has been found in a more limited number of on-road measurement studies (Tong et al, 2000;Shah et al, 2006;Durbin et al, 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…As shown in Table 1, the EFs of PM 2.5 in the WZS tunnel was 70.1 ± 15.9 mg·veh −1 ·km −1 , whereas it was 22.2 ± 6.52 mg·veh −1 ·km −1 in the KXL tunnel. ; It is known that, the PM 2.5 EFs of vehicles could be influenced by many factors, such as vehicle type (Cheng et al, 2010;He et al, 2008), fuel quality (Yue et al, 2015), model year of the vehicles (Liu et al, 2009;Shah et al, 2006), vehicle speed (Gillies et al, 2001), and the features of the road (Pio et al, 2013). EFs of PM 2.5 in this study were compared with those from other tunnel studies in China (Table 1).…”
Section: Emission Factors Of Pm 25 and Comparison With That From Othmentioning
confidence: 99%