2012
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2012.707163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emissions monitoring at a deep-pit swine finishing facility: Research methods and system performance

Abstract: This paper describes part of a comprehensive National Air Emissions Monitoring Study (NAEMS) conducted at a swine finishing farm located in the state of Indiana, in the United States. The NAEMS was a 2-year study of emissions from animal feeding operations that produce pork, chicken meat, eggs, and milk. It provided emission data for the US. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop tools for estimating emissions from livestock farms. The study in Indiana focused on quantifying and characterizing emissi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that PM 10 and PM 2.5 have gradually outpaced inhalable PM and respirable PM as the measurement focus, especially in recent years. Additionally, during this period, several major monitoring campaigns were conducted to determine the baseline emission of air pollutants from animal facilities, e.g., the Four Country study in Northern Europe [39], the Aerial Pollutant Emissions from Confined Animal Buildings (APECAB) study in the U.S. Midwest [40], and the National Air Emissions Monitoring Study (NAEMS) across the U.S. [41]. These campaigns have greatly facilitated the use of highly accurate, realtime instruments and the development of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for PM concentration measurement in swine barns.…”
Section: Pm Mass Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that PM 10 and PM 2.5 have gradually outpaced inhalable PM and respirable PM as the measurement focus, especially in recent years. Additionally, during this period, several major monitoring campaigns were conducted to determine the baseline emission of air pollutants from animal facilities, e.g., the Four Country study in Northern Europe [39], the Aerial Pollutant Emissions from Confined Animal Buildings (APECAB) study in the U.S. Midwest [40], and the National Air Emissions Monitoring Study (NAEMS) across the U.S. [41]. These campaigns have greatly facilitated the use of highly accurate, realtime instruments and the development of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for PM concentration measurement in swine barns.…”
Section: Pm Mass Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that PM10 and PM2.5 have gradually outpaced inhalable PM and respirable PM as the measurement focus, especially in recent years. Also during this period, several major monitoring campaigns were conducted to determine the baseline emission of air pollutants from animal facilities, e.g., the Four Country study in Northern Europe (Takai et al, 1998), the Aerial Pollutant Emissions from Confined Animal Buildings (APECAB) study in the U.S. Midwest (Jacobson et al, 2006), and the National Air Emissions Monitoring Study (NAEMS) across the U.S. (Jin et al, 2012). These campaigns have greatly facilitated the use of highly accurate, real-time instruments and the development of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for PM concentration measurement in swine barns.…”
Section: Pm Mass Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of this study, rooms 5 and 7 of this barn (separated by a 3.2 m wide hallway) were treated as the barn 1 and barn 2 sampling locations, respectively. For about the first 110 days of each growing cycle (Jin et al, 2012), all nursery pigs (approximately 4000 head) were housed in two rooms, after which they were separated to fill the other two rooms as growth demanded. The barn was mechanically ventilated year-round using three 61 cm pit fans and one 92 cm and four 122 cm diameter end wall fans (used in stages as barn temperature increased).…”
Section: Indiana Swine (In3b)mentioning
confidence: 99%