Emissions of Volatile Particulate Components from Turboshaft Engines Operated with JP-8 and Fischer-Tropsch Fuels

Abstract

Particulate emissions from two types of helicopter turboshaft engines operated with military JP-8 and paraffinic Fischer-Tropsch (FT) fuels were characterized as an objective of the field campaign held at the Hunter Army Airfield in Savannah, GA in June 2007. In general helicopter engines exhaust particles size distributions observed at the engine nozzle and 4.14 m downstream locations showing the geometric mean diameters smaller than 50 nm for all engine power settings investigated in this study. For both locations, the geometric mean diameter increased as the engine power setting increased; this trend also holds true for the emitted particle number concentration. The growth of particle geometric mean diameter was found significant, 7 nm, only in the case of the idle power setting.Sulfur-to-sulfate conversion was found to be independent of the engine power setting. Emissions of both sulfur and sulfate increased as the engine power increased. When JP-8 fuel was used, particles smaller than 7 nm were found to increase in samples taken at the downstream location. The number concentration in this tail increased as the power setting increased. No such observation was found when FT fuel was used implying that the increased formation of nuclei particles in the plume downstream was likely to be caused by the sulfur and aromatic compounds in the JP-8 fuel. Total particulate carbon emissions increased as the engine power setting increased. Use of FT fuel reduced the elemental carbon emissions as it compared to the JP-8 fuel, and organic carbon emission at idle power but not at the higher powers. The reduction of elemental carbon by the FT fuel was attributed to the absence of aromatics (soot precursors) in the fuel. The OC/EC ratio was found to be in the range of 3-50 depending on the engine power setting. The aircraft emitted OC/EC was found to decrease as the engine power increased.

Improved measurement for volatile particles: Vapor-particle separator design and laboratory tests

“…The peak height at 17 nm was reduced by 25% as T increased from 21 to 100 • C. Remember that NaCl is non-volatile under these two temperature conditions. Loss of the 17-nm NaCl particles could be due to (1) diffusional of particles to the tube wall and or (2) vaporization caused by the heat. The percentage reduction is much greater than our experience with the VPS.…”

“…1 The engine particles are ultrafine 1, 2 and could be more toxic than the larger ones due to their large surface area per unit mass and small size, which could enhance their ability to translocate once they are inhaled. 3 When the engine particles are heated to sufficiently high temperature, the condensible fraction will vaporize.…”

Characterization of a new miniCAST with diffusion flame and premixed flame options: Generation of particles with high EC content in the size range 30 nm to 200 nm

“…This raised concerns as to whether miniCAST soot is suitable as diesel-soot surrogate. Ideally, laboratorygenerated soot should exhibit high EC and BC content (>60%) even at small particle sizes (geometric mean diameter GMD <100 nm) to mimic diesel (Puzun et al 2011;Lu et al 2012) and aircraft engine soot (Cheng et al 2009;Lobo et al 2015;Abegglen et al 2016;Durdina et al 2016) without thermal treatment to reduce the OC content.…”

Experimental Comparison of Two Portable and Real-Time Size Distribution Analyzers for Nano/Submicron Aerosol Measurements

“…The advantages of using the SMPS system are that PSDs can be measured in a relatively short time, and different dose metrics (e.g., the number, surface area, and volume) of PM 1.0 , ultrafine and nanoparticles can be estimated simultaneously (Cheng et al, 2009;Du et al, 2012;Filep et al, 2013;Fission et al, 2013;Sahu et al, 2013;Stabile et al, 2013;Sarangi et al, 2015). However, the current commercially available SMPS systems (e.g., TSI SMPS 3936 and 3938, USA; GRIMM SMPS+C or SMPS+E, Germany; MSP Wide Range Particle Spectrometer, WPS M1000XP, USA; Palas U-SMPS, Germany) are large, bulky, expensive, and/or use radioactive neutralizers, making them inappropriate for routine exposure monitoring and assessment (Qi and Kulkarni, 2012;Ostraat et al, 2013).…”