2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emoji as Affective Symbols: Affective Judgments of Emoji, Emoticons, and Human Faces Varying in Emotional Content

Abstract: An important function of emoji as communicative symbols is to convey emotional content from sender to receiver in computer-mediated communication, e. g., WhatsApp. However, compared with real faces, pictures or words, many emoji are ambiguous because they do not symbolize a discrete emotion or feeling state. Thus, their meaning relies on the context of the message in which they are embedded. Previous studies investigated affective judgments of pictures, faces, and words suggesting that these stimuli show a typ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(76 reference statements)
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only when the individual propensity to trust is low, emoji could play a key role in online trust between acquaintances. This finding is consistent with those of previous studies and proves, once again, the fragility of new relationships within contemporary social networks and the important role of individual levels of trust ( Fischer and Herbert, 2021 ). Individuals with high levels of propensity to trust are prone to make positive judgments regarding the abilities, goodwill, integrity, and other characteristics of other people.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only when the individual propensity to trust is low, emoji could play a key role in online trust between acquaintances. This finding is consistent with those of previous studies and proves, once again, the fragility of new relationships within contemporary social networks and the important role of individual levels of trust ( Fischer and Herbert, 2021 ). Individuals with high levels of propensity to trust are prone to make positive judgments regarding the abilities, goodwill, integrity, and other characteristics of other people.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Online social media frequently use specialized languages, such as abbreviations, hashtags, emoticons, and emojis as substitutes to compensate for the absence of non-verbal cues ( Fathiya, 2018 ; Fischer and Herbert, 2021 ). Generally speaking, an emoji is a small digital image or icon used to express an idea or emotion ( Ganster et al, 2012 ; Singh et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other important stimulus characteristics such as colour and trust also need to be considered in future research, since very little systematic research has examined these important icon characteristics (but see Horton, 1994;Liu et al, 2021;Richardson, Revell, Kim, et al, 2021). Similarly, there is a growing need for better understanding of emojis, which are increasingly used in online media including quantification of their particular characteristics (see Daniel & Camp, 2020;Fischer & Herbert, 2021;Rodrigues et al, 2018). Despite these caveats, the potential bias resulting from the rating context in subjective ratings of icons is clear and should be noted by icon designers and researchers alike, particularly where time-critical or safety-critical icons are being evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paralinguistic cues-and emoji, in particular-are used to customize messages, help disambiguate and provide context to a message, signal the intention of the sender, or express emotionality, support, and affection [8][9][10][11][12][13]. For example, recent studies showed that messages with (vs. without) emoji were perceived as emotionally more intense [14] and that the emotionality conveyed by emoji and human faces is similar [15]. This suggests that emojis are effective cues to transmit emotional content in written communication (but see also [16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%