1995
DOI: 10.1080/02699939508408972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion and prior knowledge in memory and judged comprehension of ambiguous stories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
28
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with our hypotheses and past research on the effects of negative emotions on the more general cases of learning and reading comprehension and on the specific case of processing identitythreatening messages. Previous research has shown that negative emotions (compared with positive emotions) were less likely to result in coherencebuilding inferences during reading (Bohn-Gettler & Rapp, 2011), less likely to result in integration of unexpected information (Pinheiro et al, 2013), and more likely to result in poorer memory for texts (Ellis et al, 1995a(Ellis et al, , 1995b(Ellis et al, , 1997a(Ellis et al, , 1997b. Relatedly, in the context of knowledge revision paradigms, the findings of the current study are consistent with previous research that has shown that negative emotions were less likely to result in change in attitudes about a science phenomenon (Broughton et al, 2013) and more likely to result in a critical evaluation of science communication messages (Nauroth et al, 2014).…”
Section: Epistemic Emotions As Mechanisms In Knowledge Revisionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These findings are consistent with our hypotheses and past research on the effects of negative emotions on the more general cases of learning and reading comprehension and on the specific case of processing identitythreatening messages. Previous research has shown that negative emotions (compared with positive emotions) were less likely to result in coherencebuilding inferences during reading (Bohn-Gettler & Rapp, 2011), less likely to result in integration of unexpected information (Pinheiro et al, 2013), and more likely to result in poorer memory for texts (Ellis et al, 1995a(Ellis et al, , 1995b(Ellis et al, , 1997a(Ellis et al, , 1997b. Relatedly, in the context of knowledge revision paradigms, the findings of the current study are consistent with previous research that has shown that negative emotions were less likely to result in change in attitudes about a science phenomenon (Broughton et al, 2013) and more likely to result in a critical evaluation of science communication messages (Nauroth et al, 2014).…”
Section: Epistemic Emotions As Mechanisms In Knowledge Revisionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Negative affect can influence processing by leading to a focus on analytic processing in which readers are less likely to make inferential connections (Bohn-Gettler & Rapp, 2011; Ellis & Ashbrook, 1989; Ellis, Ottaway, Varner, Becker, & Moore, 1997; Ellis, Varner, Becker, & Ottaway, 1995; Fiedler, 2001; Forgas, 1995, 2000; Seibert & Ellis, 1991). In addition, individuals with low working memory demonstrate poorer emotion regulation (Schmeichel, Volokhov, & Demaree, 2008), which may allow emotions to influence their text processing to a greater degree (Bohn-Gettler & Rapp, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When individuals make effortful decisions about to-be-remembered information during encoding then they are more likely to later recall this information as it will have been processed more deeply (Hertel, 1989;Tyler, Hertel, McCallum, & Ellis, 1979). In both experiments, Ellis et al found that participants in a negative mood during encoding recalled fewer target words than neutral mood controls (see also Ellis, Varner, Becker, & Ottaway, 1995;Seibert & Ellis, 1991). These impairments occurred as the features of the encoding tasks that typically enhance recall, such as creating additional retrieval cues during elaboration, could not be processed due to the reduced attentional resources that arose from being in a negative mood.…”
Section: Negative Moods During Either Encoding or Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 97%