2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00308-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion and reason in persuasion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"The key features of advertising messages and consumers along with their interaction effects are part of theory-driven model of greenwashing effects, which enable us to explain the rational and affective mechanisms of greenwashing effects" [3]. Rational cognition and effect are the two qualitative distinctive yet concurrent persuasive mechanisms that lead to formulating attitude are the main postulates of the ARI model [38,39]. Dependent upon the features of the messages to which consumers are often open, the formulation of an attitude is grounded on a positive impact of effect, a positive impact of rational cognition, or the impact of both mechanisms simultaneously [3].…”
Section: Ari Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"The key features of advertising messages and consumers along with their interaction effects are part of theory-driven model of greenwashing effects, which enable us to explain the rational and affective mechanisms of greenwashing effects" [3]. Rational cognition and effect are the two qualitative distinctive yet concurrent persuasive mechanisms that lead to formulating attitude are the main postulates of the ARI model [38,39]. Dependent upon the features of the messages to which consumers are often open, the formulation of an attitude is grounded on a positive impact of effect, a positive impact of rational cognition, or the impact of both mechanisms simultaneously [3].…”
Section: Ari Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing risk communication literature has addressed the concept of risk perception and related psychological factors, including affective or emotion appraisals (Loewenstein, Weber, Hsee, & Welch, 2001). Affect is believed to be a critical stimulus in eliciting cognitive and behavioral changes in individuals (Buck, Anderson, Chaudhuri, & Ray, 2004; Jin, Pang, Cameron, 2007; Tuner, 2006). According to the appraisal tendency theory (Lerner & Keltner, 2000), emotions are related to an individual’s cognitive response to stimuli.…”
Section: Emotions and Risk Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Buck et al (2004) proved that relative effects of affect and reason can vary and the variance is obtained from the ratio of affect to reason. Accordingly, they proposed the ARI model that measures involvement by calculating the average affective and rational involvement (reason+affect)/2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, they proposed the ARI model that measures involvement by calculating the average affective and rational involvement (reason+affect)/2). Based on taxonomies provided by Vaughn (1980Vaughn ( , 1986 and Buck et al (2004), it is concluded that consumers tend to be more obsessed in purchasing decisions about products with high affective/rational ratio and involvement, compared to products with low affective/rational ratio and involvement. Moreover, information processing in high-involvement products is greater (Kressmann et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%