Emotion processing across and within species: A comparison between humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Abstract

For social species, recognizing and adequately yet quickly responding to the emotions of others is crucial for their survival. The current study investigates attentional biases toward emotions in two closely related species, humans and chimpanzees. Prior research has demonstrated that humans typically show an attentional bias toward emotions. We here build on that literature by studying the underlying unconscious mechanisms within and across humans and chimpanzees and aim to gain insight into the evolutionary continuity of expressions. Experiment 1 tested whether chimpanzees show an attentional bias toward the expressions of conspecifics and whether this putative bias is modulated by the stimulus presentation duration, being 33 ms or 300 ms. The stimuli were followed by a visual mask in the form of a neutral body image. This backward-masking procedure eliminated the visibility of the stimuli that were presented for 33 ms, rendering their presentation subliminal. In contrast to our prediction, no attentional bias toward emotions was observed in chimpanzees. The goal of Experiment 2 was to verify this finding and to investigate chimpanzees' reaction to human stimuli. Replicating Experiment 1, no evidence of an attentional bias toward emotions was observed in chimpanzees. In Experiment 3 we used the same chimpanzee and human expressions in 711 museum visitors and confirmed that humans do have an attentional bias toward emotions. Interestingly, this bias was independent of the stimulus presentation duration and most strikingly, independent of the species that was observed. Implications for theorizing about species differences in attentional mechanisms in processing emotions are discussed, as well as directions for future research, to investigate our preliminary findings and this potential species difference further. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Attention Towards Emotions is Modulated by Familiarity with the Expressor. A Comparison Between Bonobos and Humans

“…Although the expressions were salient enough for humans to capture attention, they may not have been equally salient for bonobos. Our results fit with earlier findings showing that human participants had an attentional bias towards isolated whole bodily expressions of emotion of chimpanzees and humans, but chimpanzees did not 37 . However, there is some evidence that apes process emotional expressions of humans similarly as those of conspecifics.…”

Exploring attentional bias towards threatening faces in chimpanzees using the dot probe task

“…subliminal presentation) in humans [72]. However, in chimpanzees Kret et al [41] failed to find vigilance towards threatening whole-body images presented at 33 ms (also subliminal presentation) and 300 ms. Together, these results suggest the optimal SOA for facilitating vigilance may be very precise and so it would be useful to test additional SOAs in the future.…”

“…Attention was biased towards emotional scenes, with the strongest biases towards affiliative and protective behaviours such as sex, yawning and grooming. However, when Kret et al [41] presented eight chimpanzees with conspecific whole-body threatening stimuli (fearful and display expressions) paired with neutral stimuli for 33 ms and 300 ms no vigilance towards threatening stimuli was found.…”

The Relationship Between Trait Emotional Intelligence and Personality. Is Trait EI Really Anchored Within the Big Five, Big Two and Big One Frameworks?

“…Moreover, Fischman (1993) showed that evolution has favored individuals with the ability to better regulate their brain activity and therefore their thoughts and emotions. Furthermore, Kret et al (2018) proposed that the ability to recognize emotions in others and adequately yet quickly responding to them is crucial for survival.…”