2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion regulation in adolescents: An ERP study

Abstract: The findings suggest that 1) the LPP is an effective tool to study processes associated with emotion regulation in adolescents, and 2) expressive suppression, in terms of its neural indicators, seems to become more effective with age. The nature and utility of expressive suppression as a specific form of emotion regulation in adolescents are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
35
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(115 reference statements)
6
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Microstates 13, 14, and 15, which ranged from around 300 to 400 ms after stimulus onset, and the last microstate, which ranged from 520 to 600 ms after stimulus onset, are most probably tied to the LPP, even though the local differences in parietal areas were not always present. There has been evidence of different spatial patterns of the LPP course, depending on valence and ER strategy (Desatnik et al, 2017), and our results appear to support that. We could observe a drift of stronger positivity in the Active Viewing Positive condition from centro-parietal areas in the left hemisphere to frontal electrodes in the right hemisphere and back to the large centro-parietal cluster.…”
Section: Implications Of the Comparison Of Positive And Negative Valencesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microstates 13, 14, and 15, which ranged from around 300 to 400 ms after stimulus onset, and the last microstate, which ranged from 520 to 600 ms after stimulus onset, are most probably tied to the LPP, even though the local differences in parietal areas were not always present. There has been evidence of different spatial patterns of the LPP course, depending on valence and ER strategy (Desatnik et al, 2017), and our results appear to support that. We could observe a drift of stronger positivity in the Active Viewing Positive condition from centro-parietal areas in the left hemisphere to frontal electrodes in the right hemisphere and back to the large centro-parietal cluster.…”
Section: Implications Of the Comparison Of Positive And Negative Valencesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, findings regarding the direction of influence of ER on ERP components are rather inconsistent, not only due to differences in the electrode positions used for LPP computation. Suppressing emotional expression de-or increased the LPP's amplitude depending on time window, recording site, and the person's age in a study by Desatnik et al (2017), while Yuan et al (2015) identified a generally faster amplitude decrease through expressive suppression than through cognitive reappraisal. The latter did not depend on the person's age in another study but impacted the LPP based on whether the instruction was to up-or downregulate emotions (Langeslag & Van Strien, 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As far as children and adolescents are concerned, researches have also found that LPP is an effective tool for studying the process and effects of emotion regulation, as well as age development differences [25,36,37], because its characteristics may be able to reflect the staged differences in the brain function and cognitive development of adolescent individuals. Many studies have suggested that when participants of different ages use reappraisal, there are differences in performance in different time windows of LPP [25,38].…”
Section: Erp Components Related To Emotion Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, findings regarding the direction of influence of ER on ERP components are rather inconsistent. Results of the LPP depend on time window, recording site, age 38 , not on age but on up- or down-regulation in various ways 39 42 , and strategy 37 . Even the perceptual Early Posterior Negativity (EPN), which peaks between 200 and 300 ms after stimulus onset and indicates attention allocation 43 , appears to be either temporally shifted when watching negative stimuli 44 or not affected by ER at all 41 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%