Emotional expressions as appeals to recipients.

Abstract

Emotion expressions convey information. One important kind of information, from a communicative perspective, is information about what is demanded of the recipients of the expression. Compared to the vast body of research that focuses on whether, and to what degree, emotion expressions convey information about inner states, there is surprisingly little systematic research on the information emotion expressions convey about what the expresser wants the recipient to do. The present research documents for the first time the set of appeals associated with the expressions of anger, fear, happiness, sadness, and disgust. In two studies, we found that (a) generally, for each emotional expression, a core appeal is perceived as being made on recipients, but also a range of complementary demands, and that (b) context matters, as is the case for social perception of emotions in general. In this case, who caused the emotion expression affects the mapping between emotional expressions and appeals. Finally, (c) recipients report intentions to comply with these appeals, as can be expected from a functional point of view. Overall, these findings put the focus squarely on the imperative dimension of emotional expressions and lend support to the view that emotional communication entails an attempt to influence recipients rather than simply to inform them about how expressers feel or what they may do next.

Should I “check my emotions at the door” or express how I feel? Role of emotion regulation versus expression of male leaders speaking out against sexism in the workplace

“…In particular, when people are prompted to take the perspective of targets of prejudice, it is common to feel sadness (Vescio et al, 2003). Witnessing sadness leads to feelings of empathy, in turn sparking helping behaviors, with sadness being the main predictor of helping behaviors (Cialdini et al, 1987; Keltner & Kring, 1998; Scarantino et al, 2021). Thus, similar to anger, perceiving sadness of others can encourage one to act, and engage prosocially.…”

The different shades of laughter: when do we laugh and when do we mimic other's laughter?

“…The authors explain this with the notion that smiles are more ambiguous in their meaning and require some indication that the smile is indeed a positive signal before they will be mimicked. Sadness expressions, by contrast, have a strong appeal for empathy [18] and hence are less ambiguous in meaning. Whether laughter will be mimicked, should therefore depend on the perceived appropriateness of the observed behaviour and the perceived closeness of expresser and observer.…”

The Dual Effect of COVID-19 on Intergroup Conflict in the Korean Peninsula

“…A recent study, conducted in the context of the Korean conflict, revealed that the effect of South Koreans' group based hatred on support of military action against North Korea as well as on support for conciliatory policies, went above and beyond various variables, such as ideology and group identification, (Halperin and Nir 2019). Emotions can be explained as mental states of readiness (Scarantino and de Sousa 2018), incorporating motivation and directed action towards a certain target (Bagozzi et al 1999). As such, their role as mediating factors between social reactions to COVID-19 and intergroup escalation and cooperation may be especially important.…”