2012
DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2011.596390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional Geographies of Method Acting in Asian American Theater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…how meaning is literally embodied in the dancer's physicality, in the phenomenological realities of weight, space and movement intentionality' (Albright 1997, 50). There are limitations to this approach in terms of capturing experience and feeling, but observational techniques can convey the expressiveness of the performing body (Rogers 2012, Veal 2016. For screendances, issues of editing and screen spatiality are paid greater attention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…how meaning is literally embodied in the dancer's physicality, in the phenomenological realities of weight, space and movement intentionality' (Albright 1997, 50). There are limitations to this approach in terms of capturing experience and feeling, but observational techniques can convey the expressiveness of the performing body (Rogers 2012, Veal 2016. For screendances, issues of editing and screen spatiality are paid greater attention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of portraying a character onstage, the actor moves from “me” to “not‐me” to “not‐not‐me” (Turner 1982:120–21). If “me” is the idea of the self, and “not‐me” is the character as it appears in the text to be acted out, then “not‐not‐me” is a synthesis of the self and the character or persona to be played (see also Rogers 2012 on method acting). This synthesis is what allows theatrical acting to be believable.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section articulates how engaging with the field of intercultural performance can extend geographical analyses of the performing arts that focus on identity. The relationship between identity and the performing arts is a long-standing theme in geographical research (see Cresswell, 2006; Nash, 2000; Richardson, 2013, 2015; Rogers, 2010, 2012b), but as geographers focus their attention on how marginalized, precarious or vulnerable bodies are engaged in, and validated by, the performing arts, issues of identity are increasingly being recast through a concern with how performance facilitates socio-cultural interactions. As a result, the languages and practices of interculturalism are starting to appear (Noxolo, 2016; Pratt et al, forthcoming; Richardson, 2013; Rogers, 2014, 2015; Veale, 2015).…”
Section: Intercultural Aestheticsmentioning
confidence: 99%