2020
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0110728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional Impact for Predicting Student Performance in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS)

Abstract: Current Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) provide better recommendations for students to improve their learning. These recommendations mainly involve students' performance prediction, which remains problematic for ITS, despite the significant improvements made by prediction methods such as Matrix Factorization (MF). The present contribution therefore aims to provide a solution to this prediction problem by proposing an approach that combines Multiple Linear Regression (Modelling Emotional Impact) and a Weight… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the Matrix Factorization technique has encountered several improvements such as: MRMF (Multi-Relational Matrix Factorization) [14], WMRMF (Weighted Multi-Relational Matrix Factorization) [15], So-WMRMF (Social Weigthed Multi-Relational Matrix Factorization) [16], Emo -WMRMF (Emotional Weigthed Multi-Relational Matrix Factorization) [15], SoEmo-WMRMF (Socio-Emotional Weigthed Multi-Relational Matrix Factorization) [17]. These approaches generally try to draw on several domain relationships.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the Matrix Factorization technique has encountered several improvements such as: MRMF (Multi-Relational Matrix Factorization) [14], WMRMF (Weighted Multi-Relational Matrix Factorization) [15], So-WMRMF (Social Weigthed Multi-Relational Matrix Factorization) [16], Emo -WMRMF (Emotional Weigthed Multi-Relational Matrix Factorization) [15], SoEmo-WMRMF (Socio-Emotional Weigthed Multi-Relational Matrix Factorization) [17]. These approaches generally try to draw on several domain relationships.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most important supervised (classification, regression), unsupervised (clustering), and reinforcement learning algorithms of machine learning are common as tools in biometrics or neuroscience research to detect emotions and affective attitudes, and are listed below: Among classification algorithms the most common choices are: naïve Bayes [ 158 , 159 , 160 ], Decision Tree [ 161 , 162 , 163 ], Random Forest [ 164 , 165 , 166 ], Support Vector Machines [ 167 , 168 , 169 ], and K Nearest Neighbors [ 170 , 171 , 172 ]. Among regression algorithms the usual choices are: linear regression [ 173 , 174 , 175 ], Lasso Regression [ 176 , 177 ], Logistic Regression [ 178 , 179 , 180 ], Multivariate Regression [ 181 , 182 ], and Multiple Regression Algorithm [ 183 , 184 ]. Among clustering algorithms the most common choices in biometrics or neuroscience research are: K-Means Clustering [ 185 , 186 , 187 ], Fuzzy C-means Algorithm [ 188 , 189 ], Expectation-Maximization (EM) Algorithm [ 190 ], and Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm [ 188 , 191 , 192 ].…”
Section: Brain and Biometric Affect Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among regression algorithms the usual choices are: linear regression [ 173 , 174 , 175 ], Lasso Regression [ 176 , 177 ], Logistic Regression [ 178 , 179 , 180 ], Multivariate Regression [ 181 , 182 ], and Multiple Regression Algorithm [ 183 , 184 ].…”
Section: Brain and Biometric Affect Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isenman (2018) argues that emotion has above all a prospective or motivational role. For these two reasons, we recently proposed in Assielou, Haba, Gooré, Kadjo, and Yao (2020a), an FM approach we called So-WMRMF, which combines students' cognitive capacities and the power of group relations in a Multi-Relational framework. Unlike the work carried out by most of the authors of the related literature, in this approach, the characteristic vector of a student is influenced by the weighted average of the characteristic vectors of all the participants in the working group.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the So-WMRMF approach proposed by Assielou et al (2020a), it is assumed that a student's s performance is affected by their s N work group friends in the following way: In Equation 5, 1 s w denotes the estimated characteristic vector of student s, given those of their work group companions.…”
Section: Weighted Multi-relational Matrix Factorization and Social (So-wmrmf) Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%