2017
DOI: 10.5153/sro.4210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional Reflexivity and the Guiding Principle of Objectivity in an Inter-Disciplinary, Multi-Method, Longitudinal Research Project

Abstract: This paper demonstrates how emotional reflexivity can help researchers aspire to the benchmark of objectivity. It will be argued that emotional exchanges during interviews with research participants can enhance understanding based on the author's research experiences in an inter-disciplinary, multi-method, longitudinal study of low-energy, social housing in Aberdeen, Scotland. It will then be demonstrated that emotional reflexivity allowed the researcher to identify how his feelings of empathy with the househo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following recent calls for affective methodologies in feminist research (Knudsen and Stage, 2015), we encourage researchers to be more attuned to (Preece et al, 2022) and reflexive of the discomfort (see Chadwick, 2021) and disorientations (Ahmed, 2006) experienced during fieldwork. Fear, frustration, disgust, and other “negative” emotions experienced during fieldwork can be both empirically enlightening and epistemologically fruitful, whereby reflecting (McKenzie, 2017) on these “disorientating” affective responses to our research contexts (and our research informants) can in fact awaken us as researchers to new subjectivities (Preece et al, 2022), including realizations of our own (hidden) vulnerability (Downey, 2019).…”
Section: Toward Intersectional Research: Views From the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following recent calls for affective methodologies in feminist research (Knudsen and Stage, 2015), we encourage researchers to be more attuned to (Preece et al, 2022) and reflexive of the discomfort (see Chadwick, 2021) and disorientations (Ahmed, 2006) experienced during fieldwork. Fear, frustration, disgust, and other “negative” emotions experienced during fieldwork can be both empirically enlightening and epistemologically fruitful, whereby reflecting (McKenzie, 2017) on these “disorientating” affective responses to our research contexts (and our research informants) can in fact awaken us as researchers to new subjectivities (Preece et al, 2022), including realizations of our own (hidden) vulnerability (Downey, 2019).…”
Section: Toward Intersectional Research: Views From the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%