2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional Stroop interference in trauma-exposed individuals: A contrast between two accounts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Trauma fits within this model, as those exposed to TLEs often disproportionately allocate attention to threatening stimuli, which consequently could lead to incorrect inferences in line with paranoid ideation (Sherrer, 2011). These biases in information processing, measured behaviorally (e.g., Emotional Stroop task) or neurophysiologically (e.g., EEG), have been found in traumatized (Caparos & Blanchette, 2014; Wingenfeld et al, 2011), psychotic disordered (Bendall et al, 2013b; Besnier et al, 2010; Kinderman, Prince, Waller, & Peters, 2003; Wiffen et al, 2013), CHR (Rosier et al, 2013; Nieman et al, 2014), and subclinical psychosis samples (Fisher et al, 2014b; Marks, Steel, & Peters, 2012). These populations have been found to have longer reaction times for threatening words, suggesting a general attention bias towards threatening stimuli (Bendall et al, 2013b; Cisler et al, 2011; Wiffen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Proposed Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Trauma fits within this model, as those exposed to TLEs often disproportionately allocate attention to threatening stimuli, which consequently could lead to incorrect inferences in line with paranoid ideation (Sherrer, 2011). These biases in information processing, measured behaviorally (e.g., Emotional Stroop task) or neurophysiologically (e.g., EEG), have been found in traumatized (Caparos & Blanchette, 2014; Wingenfeld et al, 2011), psychotic disordered (Bendall et al, 2013b; Besnier et al, 2010; Kinderman, Prince, Waller, & Peters, 2003; Wiffen et al, 2013), CHR (Rosier et al, 2013; Nieman et al, 2014), and subclinical psychosis samples (Fisher et al, 2014b; Marks, Steel, & Peters, 2012). These populations have been found to have longer reaction times for threatening words, suggesting a general attention bias towards threatening stimuli (Bendall et al, 2013b; Cisler et al, 2011; Wiffen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Proposed Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Total score ranged from 0 to 10, where a higher score represented a better olfactory function. 29 , the words were divided into three groups, containing neutral words (NEU), positive words (POS) and negative words (NEG) from scrutinized Chinese thesaurus 30 . Each group contained 20 words.…”
Section: Evaluation Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La prueba de Stroop emocional ha sido utilizada para el estudio de los procesos preatencionales en trastornos de ansiedad y depresión (v.g. Başgöze, Gönül, Baskak, & Gökçay, 2015;Caparos & Blanchette, 2014;Dresler et al, 2012;Gantiva et al, 2012), y de otras problemáticas como trastornos adictivos o dismórficos corporales (v.g. Jiang, Zhao, & Le, 2017;Toh, Castle, & Rossell, 2017), algunas de ellas en versión computarizada, para controlar errores en la precisión de la medida y los relativos a la administración del instrumento.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified